Cadillac Escalade Hybrid
Sponsored links:

Let’s be clear: the 2009 Cadillac Escalade 4WD Hybrid is 17 feet long, weighs almost 3 tons, costs $73,000, and gets about 20 miles per gallon. That’s not what most people think of when they hear “hybrid.”
But this is the hybrid for you if you need a vehicle that can tow 5,800 pounds, seat 7 people, and still maximize your mileage. It boasts fuel economy of 20 city / 21 highway; those aren’t Toyota Prius numbers, for sure, but the city mileage is 50 percent better than a non-hybrid Escalade. You also get far more luxury than in the Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid (and its twin the GMC Yukon Hybrid); all three are essentially the same vehicle, underneath various levels of fancy dress.
After an afternoon of fairly aggressive driving, the Cadillac Escalade Hybrid's dashboard mpg display told the story: 16.3 mpg. (Photos: John Voelcker. All rights reserved.)
Positioning
Launched in August 2008, the Escalade Hybrid is unquestionably the world’s blingiest hybrid. GM’s characteristic hybrid-logo-with-green-leaf is rendered in large, garish chrome letters in a fender vent the size of your fist—which sits at chest level to a standard-issue human being.
And some of its customers bask in the bling. One is Santonio Holmes, the 2009 Super Bowl’s Most Valuable Player, who was awarded an Escalade Hybrid 2WD Platinum Edition. GM didn’t publicize the award—bad form during the bailouts—but he got the top-of-the-line model. The Platinum Edition denotes unique front styling, LED headlights, four DVD screens, and more, and runs you $85,000.
It’s worth pointing out that adding the hybrid option to an Escalade actually saves more gasoline than replacing an economy car with a hybrid Prius. It’s because Americans measure mileage rather than consumption. Here’s the math (roughly): The Hybrid improves the Escalade’s mileage from 16 mpg to 20 mpg, so over 100 miles, fuel usage falls from 6.25 gallons to 5—saving 1.25 gallons. Switching from a Toyota Corolla at 33 mpg to a Prius at 50 mpg, on the other hand, saves only 1 gallon for that same 100 miles—from 3 gallons to 2. Still, it’s hard to make the case with a straight face that something this huge actually helps cut US oil imports.
Equipment
The Hybrid version of this big SUV is a complete option package that incorporates a raft of options offered on lesser Escalades. Those include 22-inch chromed aluminum wheels, remote starter, heated and cooled front seats—all rows are fragrant leather—and an “AM/FM/XM/CD radio with MP3 capability and 6-disc charger and 10-speaker Bose Studio Surround.” Phew. Other standard features include a backup camera, powered tailgate opening and closing, and a blind-spot detection system in each side mirror, which proved very useful in a truck this tall.
All of which is to say, this is a large dollop of luxury laid on what is, in the end, a very large station wagon built on a pickup truck frame. But unlike the Tahoe Hybrid (see our drive report) on which it’s based, the Escalade takes no extreme measures to reduce weight and increase mileage. The front air dam is subtly different, but there are no other aerodynamic changes or mass reductions. It even has the standard Escalade roof rack. Cadillac buyers like their features, and this Hybrid is meant to minimize compromises.
We tested a “standard” Escalade 4WD Hybrid in maroon metallic. The total sticker, including delivery, was $75,330. It came with just one option, power retractable running boards ($1,095). Normally they’re handy; I’m six feet tall, and I would have used them—except that they were promptly covered in filthy slush during our upstate New York winter, and stayed that way. All passengers welcomed the front and rear seat heaters in the chilly winter weather.
Driving Impressions
This is one really, really large vehicle, and its truck heritage is never too far from the surface. During an autumn drive over the rough country road surfaces of Bear Mountain, New York, it was obvious this 5,700-pound vehicle had a live rear axle. The rear wheels wanted to twist and hop rather than soaking up the bumps individually, as they would have with independent rear suspension like that on the Ford Expedition, its competing full-size SUV. In other words, the ride hardly evoked “luxury” in the traditional sense of a fast, comfortable, elegant sedan.
Over a full weekend, though, the ‘Slade proved itself quite competent despite the sky-high seating position and truck-like handling. Interior noise was commendably muffled, and the thick layer of luxury almost blots out the challenge of driving something this large. It’s so large, in fact, that it’s intimidating in a rear-view mirror. Traffic ahead often moved over as we approached; you can decide if that’s good or bad, but it rarely happens in a Honda or Toyota hybrid.
Inside, wood and leather dress up a conventional, somewhat plastic-y dashboard with the usual complement of controls. The “efficiency gauge” is confusing, as it uses an unmarked green bar—so it’s not immediately clear whether drivers are supposed to keep the needle to the right or the left. I had to experiment to learn that the left side meant engine low or off (high efficiency) while the right side was power on (low efficiency). A couple of pictograms could go a long way here.
With the plethora of electric gadgets, we heard random noises as the navigation system searched its DVD, accessories switched on and off, and power locks clicked as we moved away. Admittedly, this impression was exacerbated by the hush when the engine wasn’t running.
During driving, the engine switched itself off and on seamlessly, with the electronic control system’s magic guaranteeing a smooth flow of power from any combination of battery and engine. Last fall, with careful driving we got the big truck up to 25 mph on electric power alone; this time, in the colder weather, we couldn’t get much past 12 mph.
Braking was occasionally grabby as the vehicle slowed, presumably as the disks kicked in on top of the regenerative brakes. Passengers didn’t notice it, though, and the problem was intermittent.
Summary
True to the ratings, we measured exactly 20.9 miles per gallon over more than 300 miles of mixed local and highway driving. And we gave the truck high marks for effortlessly climbing a snowy logging trail in the Catskills on its way to a remote mountainside cabin.
So is the Escalade Hybrid for you? It’s no Prius, but then it was never meant to be. If you need a really big seven-seat vehicle—and have a taste for luxury and the cash to match—this $70,000+ hybrid truck may be your cup of tea. If you need that same big vehicle, but like less bling and want to baby your wallet, the Tahoe Hybrid or Yukon Hybrid may do you almost as well.
Note: The Two-Mode transmission system in the Escalade is also used in the full-size Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid and GMC Yukon Hybrid SUVs on which it’s based, and the system will appear this spring in the Chevrolet Silverado Hybrid and GMC Sierra Hybrid full-size pickup trucks. Later, it will launch in the BMW X6 Hybrid and a future Mercedes-Benz ML450 Hybrid SUV as well.
-
20 / 21 MPG 11.76 / 11.2 L/100km
-
BODY TYPE:
SUV
-
TECHNOLOGY:
Hybrid
-
BASE MSRP:
$70,000
Side-by-side Comparison
You can compare specs and photos with up to two other vehicles. Start by selecting the first one now:








The article asks:
If you need a really big seven-seat vehicle...
The real question is:
Do you really need a big seven-seat vehicle...
And the correct answer that most people who own one don't want to hear is: No
"It boasts fuel economy of 20 city / 21 highway"
Let's compare it to the non-hybrid version:
16 city/26 highway/19 combined
Why does GM even bothered wasting time remaking another gas guzzler? They should have either save the money or put it into Volt development.
Not sure were you got your data, but at www.fueleconomy.gov the numbers are 12 city/ 19 highway/ 15 combined for the non-hybrid. So the hybrid is 75% better city/ 11% better highway/ 33% better combined.
I do think it is a waste. GM needs to build high MPG hybrids. 20-21 MPG large SUVs, 20-21 MPG trucks, 28 MPG small SUVs, and 29 MPG sedans does not cut it. Toyota has the 26 MPG 3 row Highlander SUV, Ford has the 32 MPG Escape small SUV, Toyota and Nissan have 34 MPG sedans, and Ford's new Fusion Hybrid will be 38-39 MPG. GM does have the only Hybrid pickup trucks, but the Ford F150 is 15/21/17. So the GM truck gets 33% better city, but nothing on the highway. GM, Ford and Chrysler have nothing to compete with the Toyota Prius or the new Honda Insight. The Ford Fusion can compete with the smaller Honda Civic in city (40 Civic, 41 Fusion), but the Civic kills the Fusion on the highway (45 Civic, 36 Fusion).
The numbers are from a GM website. It appears the numbers are quoted in Imperial gallon instead of US gallon. Not exactly the same comparison. My mistake.
Still a gas guzzler. Still a greenwashed vehicle with a giant hybrid badge that's more smoke and mirrors. GM better learn quickly the public is not as clueless as they used to be especially in the internet age.
$85K and it has a cheap looking dashboard.
I was filling up my Camry Hybrid the other day, when someone pulled into the station with a Escalade SUV. I had to wonder why on earth anyone would want that monster ego machine, but then I realized I need to park my self-righteous ego and recognize we're all on different paths. Hopefully we can convince people who value this kind of stuff to see things differently.
As much as I think this car is utterly useless, if there is a market for it and people buy it, there is no denying that it will save gas. And for that, I think it is a good thing. (I'm not convinced that a significant percentage of large SUV drivers are going to pay extra for a hybrid. We'll see what the sales numbers say.)
After reading this article I can only think that we are all going to be doomed. Better get my son into swimming lessons soon because he is going to need it.
If you accept the facts that
1) there are people who are buying large luxury SUV's in their non-hybrid version, and
2) they are not interested in Prii, Insights, etc.,
then it is clear that making SUV's hybrids has a large effect on fuel consumption.
In fact, it is more important to convert trucks to hybrid use than cars. Increasing the fuel economy in stop and go driving of an Escalade from 12 to 20 MPG saves TWICE as much fuel as increasing a smaller car from 24 to 40 MPG. If you look at it that way, each hybrid truck has the effect of two hybrid cars.
I personally don't understand the lure of SUV's, but people want them, and people buy them. You will not turn all these purchasers into Prius-drivers. So rather than ridicule a manufacturer who is making a hybrid product that saves twice as much fuel as a hybrid compact, give them a little credit. Sure, moving them out of their conventional Escalade in a compact hybrid might take their city fuel economy from 12 to 40 MPG (instead of 20), but that's not going to happen.
Saving 40% of the fuel an SUV would use (going to 20 MPG) may not be as good as saving 70% (going to 40 MPG in a compact), but it's still HUGE.
One of the biggest problems in America is that people want it their way or nothing. You can't make other people give up SUV's, so let them join in on the hybrid bandwagon.
This isn't "compacthybridcarsonly.com, "is it?
When I was in my youth (1960s) Chevy Suburbans existed but few owned them. Our family of 5 drove 350 miles every summer to a cottage in a Ford Falcon station wagon (that would be about the size of a Toyota Corolla today). In the 1980s Ford came out with the Explorer and Chrysler the mini van. Suddenly every family needed a larger vehicle. Last summer with gas prices reaching over $4.00 a gallon suddenly people started to rethink the need to own such large vehicles. I agree that if you need such a vehicle it certainly would be better a hybrid. But hybrid or electric or diesel more energy is needed to move such large vehicles around. I still think most people who think they do - do not need such vehicles. As the cost of energy (and everything else) increases I think more folks will be downsizing. GM's 2-mode hybrid system is a good one, hopefully they can get it working on (at least slightly) smaller vehicles.
Shines, I'm in my late 40's, and I agree completely with you. Before CAFE, no one drove trucks except farmers and construction workers. Once CAFE kicked in, and then fuel prices dropped, people wanted bigger cars, couldn't buy them cheaply because of CAFE, and then bought trucks cheaply instead. Smart plan, CAFE.
In real terms, gasoline was more expensive in the mid 1970's and early 1980's than it is now, so I don't think people are going to get the idea to move to cars unless they KNOW gas will be above $4.
And why no two-mode
Malibu, Cobalt, or Aveo5?
They should also make 2-mode CTS and CTW
I would like a Yellow Cobalt two-mode in yellow with a sunroof and 6-speed manual transmission with no-lift-shift
Living in LA, from the numerous Land Rovers that I see on the streets, I know that there are some that will never give up their luxury SUV, even given the fact that SUVs are pretty high polluters (and despite the fact that Land Rover doesn't make a very reliable vehicle...but that's another story).
That being said, years ago LOTS of kids wanted an Escalade (including myself). Not that I didn't care about the environment, but seeing musicians, actors, and the wealthy drive cars like those around on MTV made people aspire to have that same car.
Fortunately now, I believe a good majority of kids are more conscious about the environment and may be more likely to get a Prius or other hybrid over an Escalade (not all, but many). I think this was a smart move of GM to build an expensive SUV that gives them a little better green image with the rich while helping their bottom line (which they desperately need right now).
An even better idea if they could pull it off successfully would be to phase out the non-hybrid Escalade and soley make the hybrid version. That would definitely help solidify their green image in the luxury market.
GR and Anonymous, you both have good ideas. Smaller two-modes should be made, and I'm sure they will. The Escalade is a more profitable vehcile to offset the cost of the hybrid system with, and should get the ball rolling. And yes, making all Escalades hybrids would make a lot of sense.
That would be a good thing to suggest to GM.
Also, since most SUV's are fashion statements, I wish we could get back to the days when muscle cars were the fashion. It doesn't take nearly as much fuel to push one of those around. Since we have the Mustang, Challenger, and Camaro (soon) on line, that could move the market some.
Hybridizing them would only help, and straight-line performance would be good very good, but making a hybrid powertrain as responsive as an ICE w/manual transmission isn't trivial. For most customers, who buy automatics anyway....
Hello AP;
"One of the biggest problems in America is that people want it their way or nothing. You can't make other people give up SUV's, so let them join in on the hybrid bandwagon."
Well these selfish ignorant people are polluting my world. What gives them the right? Money?
I know there is no political will to do the right thing, but outlawing these huge vehicles for private ownership would be the correct thing to do. At least ration CO2 for personal travel. How about a free 2,400 Kg (15,000 miles an 160 grams/mile). The next 500 Kg costs you a $500. The next 500 Kg costs $1000. The next 500Kg costs $2000. You see the pattern. Make it so that a large SUV gift, is affordable to drive.
Charles, like it or not, having money does bring certain perks. If it didn't, no one would work hard to earn them, no one would produce anything, and no one would have anything. Rationing gasoline in "peace time" is a drastic measure that creates bureaucracy and intrusion into everyone's lives. Just as logical would be to limit people to 1500 square foot homes to reduce energy usage. Outlawing the vehicles is impossible (and ineffective) - too many ways around it.
I agree that we need to discourage the usage of fuel, though. I think a much simpler way is to tax it more and return the revenue evenly as an income tax credit to all tax filers (stop me if you've heard it before). Most people will be discouraged enough to not buy SUV's, and smaller cars would be more valued by customers.
You know I thought the same thing. Until I borrowed one from a friend for a week.
I fell in love with this. IT was so safe, you rode high and it was so comfortable on long trips.
I would buy one except the millage was terrible.
However the hybrid solves this issue. So its really an amazing vehicle.
The dash is not plastic btw. It was quite nice. The toyota on the other hand is plastic.
So I give this vehicle high marks and it will save you family in a accident.
bill,
The safest vehicles are the one that allow the driver to avoid one. This factor is not measured in a crash test. Roll over is a significant factor in an SUV. SUV often false sense of security and safety in an SUV is over rated in my opinion. Take a look the following link from wiki for other safety exposures of an SUV.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_sport_utility_vehicles#Safety
70-85K for a car is ridiculous IMO. Not because it's too much for some people, but because GM should not be wasting it's assembly lines for a niche market. Why am I asked to provide tax dollars to bail out a company that dedicates a line of vehicles to rap singers and spoiled hollywood actors? Every day people come onto this and other hybrid sites complaining about a hybrid that might approach 30K, but somehow this one gets a pass.
Well, if you want to do your conspicuous consumption in a way that's slightly less damaging to the environment, the Escalade Hybrid seems like a good way to go. (Wouldn't it be nice if we cared more about feeding hungry children than buying a $70,000 boat?)
Of course, we need vehicles of all kinds that can actually be powered by clean-renewable energy.
Talk to me when there's an Escalade plug-in hybrid.
In 2003 G.M. put 225 2 mode hybrid buses on the west coast, those 225 buses saved more fuel than 90,000 Toyota Prius. Why take a 76 h.p. small car that would have gotten upper 30 mpg's and take it to mid 40's. As stated in the article the Escalade saves more fuel vs. a regular Escalade than a small car that has been hybridized. Until people quit buying large vehicles I think it is smarter to start with the vehicles that don't get as good fuel economy and improve them than to take a car that already gets good fuel economy and put a hybrid premium on it to get a little better fuel economy.
Also check out consumer reports winner and losers hybrid article, GM's Saturn VUE was the winner, I think the Prius finish 6th.
new or used (2007-2009)
Post a new comment