Comments on: 2012 Toyota Prius c

By: MoTown44240

MoTown44240 — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:38:00 +0000

The Prius C sounds what I have been looking for. I hope the dealer will work with me when ordering the Prius C level 2. I would prefer the single fold down rear seat opposed to the split rear seat. As with the other Prii, I wish that Toyota would offer as an option a booster battery that could be plugged into the primary battery. Vehicle owner’s like me rarely have passengers and would opt for increased battery power. Having an option to plugin extra battery power would serve those of us that are in the minority.

By: Expressway Toyota

Expressway Toyota — Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:24:00 +0000

EDITED: Please stop spamming this site with irrelevant comments and links to your own site.

-The Editor.

By: LPG conversion

LPG conversion — Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:55:00 +0000

EDITED: Please stop spamming this site with irrelevant comments and links to your own site.

-The Editor.

By: MrEnergyCzar

MrEnergyCzar — Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:29:21 +0000

Sitting in the car at the auto show was a downer. It is very cheaply made inside. Most would be better off with a slightly used Prius if they really want something from the Prius family..

MrEnergyCzar

By: Jeff Cobb

Jeff Cobb — Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:06:00 +0000

Thanks for reading. I believe the mistake is not ours. Please read the sentence again:

“The Prius c clocks in at 53 mpg city/46 highway and 50 combined compared to the first model’s 42/41/41 rating.”

The first generation Prius launched in the U.S. is what this is referring to. You gave a link for the 2012 Prius. A dead giveaway that the sentence was not referring to the 2012 Liftback is it compares the 1.5-liter powertrain of the first Prius to the c. The current Liftback uses a 1.8-liter engine.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/Feg/noframes/16705.shtml

Cheers.

By: Alex Chapin

Alex Chapin — Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:38:40 +0000

I believe there is a typo in your first paragraph which mistakenly claims that the first Prius has 42/41/41 city/highway/combined fuel economy numbers from the EPA, however they are actually 51/48/50 (http://fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=31767). The numbers you quoted resemble the Prius V of 44/40/42 (http://fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=31836).