<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey Suggests Massive Potential Hybrid Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/</link>
	<description>Auto alternatives for the 21st century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34826</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing this information. I really like your blog post very much. You have really shared a informative and interesting blog post with people..&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;a href=&quot;http://jocuri.ro.im&quot;&gt;jocuri&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this information. I really like your blog post very much. You have really shared a informative and interesting blog post with people..<br />
   <a href="http://jocuri.ro.im">jocuri</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34825</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here...&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://dev4media.com&quot;&gt;Dev4Media Relationships&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here&#8230;<br />
    <a href="http://dev4media.com">Dev4Media Relationships</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34824</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow what a Great Information about World Day its very nice informative post. thanks for the post.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.afformula.com/&quot;&gt;AF Formula&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what a Great Information about World Day its very nice informative post. thanks for the post.<br />
  <a href="http://www.afformula.com/">AF Formula</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Manch</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34823</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Manch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Van and I&#039;m a believer that hybrids are the wave of the future, althought I believe all electric cars still needs way better development until they turn to be a good alternative to gas, that because of their short ranges with a single charge.&lt;br /&gt;
Beside that, the charging takes too long and a single charge may not be enough for some people to travel to work and back home; I myself wouldn&#039;t make it.&lt;br /&gt;
Highways? Out of question, if you need to take the highways and travel at high speeds, all electric cars are trully not suitable for that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alfred,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://actodc-converter.info/step-down-transformer&quot;&gt;Step Down Transformer&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Van and I&#8217;m a believer that hybrids are the wave of the future, althought I believe all electric cars still needs way better development until they turn to be a good alternative to gas, that because of their short ranges with a single charge.<br />
Beside that, the charging takes too long and a single charge may not be enough for some people to travel to work and back home; I myself wouldn&#8217;t make it.<br />
Highways? Out of question, if you need to take the highways and travel at high speeds, all electric cars are trully not suitable for that.</p>
<p>Alfred,<br />
<a href="http://actodc-converter.info/step-down-transformer">Step Down Transformer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34822</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we take a peak at the EPA pollution score, a Prius gets a 9, the Tundra gets a 5.  So you can make up hypotheticals till the cows come home, but in the real world, vehicles that get the best mileage on average get the best pollution scores for the reasons presented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question we must ask ourselves why is this obvious truth being challenged, except to make a fictional case against buying hybrids.  Hybrids are the wave of the future and if the buying public understands the math, they will buy them sooner rather than later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we take a peak at the EPA pollution score, a Prius gets a 9, the Tundra gets a 5.  So you can make up hypotheticals till the cows come home, but in the real world, vehicles that get the best mileage on average get the best pollution scores for the reasons presented.</p>
<p>The question we must ask ourselves why is this obvious truth being challenged, except to make a fictional case against buying hybrids.  Hybrids are the wave of the future and if the buying public understands the math, they will buy them sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34821</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Van, you&#039;re missing the fact that some cars have more elaborate and more effective pollution control devices in the exhaust system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You&#039;re right that all engines produce about the same percentage CO, HC, and NOx into the exhaust system due to incomplete combustion. Burning more fuel means the engine emits more INTO the exhaust system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But that&#039;s not the end of the story. Catalytic converters &quot;finish the job&quot; of combustion, some better than others. Let&#039;s say a Toyota Tundra burns 4 times the fuel of a Prius. Now let&#039;s say the converter in the Tundra is 99.9% efficient in eliminating the HC, CO, and NOx, leaving 0.1%. Now let&#039;s say the converter on the Prius is only 99.5% efficient, leaving 0.5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this (hypothetical) case, the Prius would emit 25% more HC, CO, and NOx than the Tundra. Of course its CO2 would only be 1/4 of the Tundra&#039;s, because it only depends on the amount of fuel burned. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van, you&#8217;re missing the fact that some cars have more elaborate and more effective pollution control devices in the exhaust system.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that all engines produce about the same percentage CO, HC, and NOx into the exhaust system due to incomplete combustion. Burning more fuel means the engine emits more INTO the exhaust system.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not the end of the story. Catalytic converters &#8220;finish the job&#8221; of combustion, some better than others. Let&#8217;s say a Toyota Tundra burns 4 times the fuel of a Prius. Now let&#8217;s say the converter in the Tundra is 99.9% efficient in eliminating the HC, CO, and NOx, leaving 0.1%. Now let&#8217;s say the converter on the Prius is only 99.5% efficient, leaving 0.5%.</p>
<p>In this (hypothetical) case, the Prius would emit 25% more HC, CO, and NOx than the Tundra. Of course its CO2 would only be 1/4 of the Tundra&#8217;s, because it only depends on the amount of fuel burned. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34820</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me address on more urban myth, that pollution does not equate with fuel consumption.  Yes a high mileage vehicle with a malfunctioning emission control system could emit a disproportionate amount of pollutants.  But on the other hand a Prius or Camry Hybrid scores a &quot;9&quot; on the pollution scale, whereas a non-hybrid Camry scores a &quot;7&quot;.  Or to put it another way, given an &quot;average&quot; emission control system, which car emits more pollution, the one that burns the most gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And to put it even more simply, when you burn gas mixed with air, you produce various by-products such as NOX and particulates.  If your combustion system operates at the same level of performance, then burning less gas results in fewer emissions.   This is not rocket science.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me address on more urban myth, that pollution does not equate with fuel consumption.  Yes a high mileage vehicle with a malfunctioning emission control system could emit a disproportionate amount of pollutants.  But on the other hand a Prius or Camry Hybrid scores a &#8220;9&#8243; on the pollution scale, whereas a non-hybrid Camry scores a &#8220;7&#8243;.  Or to put it another way, given an &#8220;average&#8221; emission control system, which car emits more pollution, the one that burns the most gas.</p>
<p>And to put it even more simply, when you burn gas mixed with air, you produce various by-products such as NOX and particulates.  If your combustion system operates at the same level of performance, then burning less gas results in fewer emissions.   This is not rocket science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34819</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Van, just so you know, burning less fuel doesn&#039;t necessarily emit less carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons, or nitrous oxides. It depends more on the emissons treatment on the car:&lt;br /&gt;
LEV - Low-Emissions Vehicle&lt;br /&gt;
ULEV - Ultra-Low-Emissions Vehicle&lt;br /&gt;
SULEV - Super-Ultra-Low-Emissions Vehicle&lt;br /&gt;
PZEV - Partial-Zero-Emissions Vehicle&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the exhaust treatment, a Toyota Tundra that guzzles gas could emit fewer pollutants than a Prius, except for CO2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van, just so you know, burning less fuel doesn&#8217;t necessarily emit less carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons, or nitrous oxides. It depends more on the emissons treatment on the car:<br />
LEV &#8211; Low-Emissions Vehicle<br />
ULEV &#8211; Ultra-Low-Emissions Vehicle<br />
SULEV &#8211; Super-Ultra-Low-Emissions Vehicle<br />
PZEV &#8211; Partial-Zero-Emissions Vehicle</p>
<p>Depending on the exhaust treatment, a Toyota Tundra that guzzles gas could emit fewer pollutants than a Prius, except for CO2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34818</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paying attention to driving, keeping our eyes on the road, and our mind on defensive driving is a good think.  Digital systems can both train us to be better drivers, and sometimes protect us with automatic actions such as pulsating brakes and fuel cutoff. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And in a more general sense, helping drivers drive more economically reduces air pollution and our funding of foreign countries with factions at war with us. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need our culture to embrace the idea that if you can afford a hybrid, buy one for the benefit of all. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paying attention to driving, keeping our eyes on the road, and our mind on defensive driving is a good think.  Digital systems can both train us to be better drivers, and sometimes protect us with automatic actions such as pulsating brakes and fuel cutoff. </p>
<p>And in a more general sense, helping drivers drive more economically reduces air pollution and our funding of foreign countries with factions at war with us. </p>
<p>We need our culture to embrace the idea that if you can afford a hybrid, buy one for the benefit of all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/survey-suggests-massive-potential-hybrid-market-35695/#comment-34817</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=9115#comment-34817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hybrids burn less gasoline, therefore they put less pollutants into the air.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a little on &quot;pay back&quot;  Lets say I buy a Camry Hybrid for $32,000 rather than a non hybrid Camry for $27000.  And lets say I paid 10% interest for 4 years.  Looking at just the difference, I paid about $500 per year or 2,000 more due to interest, so the real difference was $7,000.  I drive the car 4 years, and then sell the car.  The Hybrid drops from 32,000 to 14,000 or a loss of 18,000 whereas the non-hybrid drops from 27,000 to 10,000 or a loss of 17,000.  So the difference over 4 years is about $8,000 more, everything considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now my gas savings amounts to about $2500, so my Hybrid cost me about $5,500 over 4 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But if I cook the books the other way, I buy a 32,000 Camry Hybrid, rather than a $35,000 Avalon non-hybrid.  I borrow less and save money on gas and lose less in depreciation.  And I am motivated to do this because I hate creating unhealthy air for kids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hybrids burn less gasoline, therefore they put less pollutants into the air.  </p>
<p>Just a little on &#8220;pay back&#8221;  Lets say I buy a Camry Hybrid for $32,000 rather than a non hybrid Camry for $27000.  And lets say I paid 10% interest for 4 years.  Looking at just the difference, I paid about $500 per year or 2,000 more due to interest, so the real difference was $7,000.  I drive the car 4 years, and then sell the car.  The Hybrid drops from 32,000 to 14,000 or a loss of 18,000 whereas the non-hybrid drops from 27,000 to 10,000 or a loss of 17,000.  So the difference over 4 years is about $8,000 more, everything considered.</p>
<p>Now my gas savings amounts to about $2500, so my Hybrid cost me about $5,500 over 4 years.</p>
<p>But if I cook the books the other way, I buy a 32,000 Camry Hybrid, rather than a $35,000 Avalon non-hybrid.  I borrow less and save money on gas and lose less in depreciation.  And I am motivated to do this because I hate creating unhealthy air for kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 383/388 objects using apc

 Served from: www.hybridcars.com @ 2013-05-25 00:07:37 by W3 Total Cache -->