Comments on: Presidential Candidates Call for More Hybrids

By: NubiaSpeer

NubiaSpeer — Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:56:23 +0000

I like this post, enjoyed this one thank you for putting up. Discover More I always was concerned in this subject and stock still am, regards for putting up.

By: GlenMichaeli

GlenMichaeli — Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:57:29 +0000

you're really a excellent webmaster. The web site loading pace is amazing. It seems that you're doing any distinctive trick. In addition, The contents are masterwork. you've done a wonderful job on this subject! More Help Hey there, You've done a fantastic job. I'll certainly digg it and in my opinion suggest to my friends. I'm confident they'll be benefited from this website.

By: Jane

Jane — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:17:10 +0000

Well this is really good news for us. The call of hybrid cars by our leaders is one step of saving our surroundings and having an improved nation in terms of clean and green environment. The Automotive Portal also supports this action.

By: tjones

tjones — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:48:08 +0000

I think Hybrid cars are a great stepping stone for the country. We need to find ways to increase gas mileage and keep the environment cleaner.

Hopefully the new president will continue to purse new vehicle technology.

By: Priusmaniac

Priusmaniac — Tue, 20 May 2008 09:55:01 +0000

If you don’t want to be an apprentice sorcer, don’t play. If you don’t know the effect of a double carbon dioxide level, a good precaution is to avoid doubling it. Nobody want to walk in the dark without knowing what is in front of him. Beside, carbon dioxide is also causing the acidification of the ocean and posing a treat to shale forming species at the base of the food chain. An increase in carbon dioxide can also trigger the release of methane hydrates trapped in solid form on the ocean floors and cause a Venus style runaway global warming effect which would not only increase temperatures but bring the ocean water to boil before the planet set to a new 150°C global equilibrium point between incoming sun radiance and earth emission. Hell on earth literally. If you want to test with Venus or Mars, fine, but don’t try it on the sole planet we are on. The world is not ours to gamble with.

By: ekertz

ekertz — Wed, 14 May 2008 05:27:43 +0000

No one who has bashed Hal for his statement about the global warming hoax has addressed what he said! They have gone to another subject and accused him of all kinds of things. Would someone please explain to me how the temperature increase can be caused by CO2 which increases approximately 800 years AFTER the temperature? Would some one please explain to me how man is supposed to have such a great effect when volcanos, animals, etc. emit FAR MORE CO2 than man? If some one can SCIENTIFICALLY explain these things, I might consider the man made global warming hypothesis! I am a scientist! Check out these items and explain man made global warming to me:

19,000+ scientists have signed a statement disagreeing with the man made global warming hypothesis. To see this list, go to:

http://www.oism.org/pproject/
or
http://www.sitewave.net/pproject/listbystate.htm

Here are some videos with information about the false global warming hypothesis:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMDi_u0dcig&feature=related (short ~ 2.5 min.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKAC4kfHruQ&feature=related (short ~ 3 min. Polar Bears)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io-Tb7vTamY&NR=1 ( ~ 9 min.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTGBcVi7n
0o ( ~ 31 min.)

Or you can view this video which is meant for a more scientific audience rather than the
general public as the previous videos were:
http://www.discovery.org/v/30 ( ~ 19 min.)

You can also read the books:
“Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years” by S. Fred Singer and Dennis Avery
And
The Politically Incorrect Guide To Global Warming And Environmentalism by Christopher C. Horner

Also, here is a multi-part video:

Global Warming – Doomsday Called Off (1/5)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr5O1HsTVgA

Global Warming – Doomsday Called Off (2/5)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fD6VBLlWmCI

Global Warming – Doomsday Called Off (3/5)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZS2eIRkcR0

Global Warming – Doomsday Called Off (4/5)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIbTJ6mhCqk

Global Warming – Doomsday Called Off (5/5)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2XALmrq3ro

Interesting article about Polar Bears and sea ice:
http://tinyurl.com/3d3erv

I hope you find these items interesting and useful!

I’m waiting for the expected attacks but no SCIENTIFIC facts and no reference to the facts that I have offered! This is the standard response by those who espouse the man made global warming religion! By the way, the temperatures have gone DOWN in the last 10 years! Oh no! GLOBAL COOLING! just like in the 1970′s!

By: Darrell D Lambson

Darrell D Lambson — Wed, 14 May 2008 02:45:32 +0000

I never knew..Hillary has the only RIGHT view; it has to be Electric/flex fuel (generator for extended range) for everyday use which would cut 80% of our dependence on foreign oil and we must save Anwar oil for
planes, trains, heavy trucks (semi’s), pickups when needed and small engines. Then we can put those CREEPS back to herding GOATS and CAMELS where they belong!
If Bush would of INVADED ENERGY INDEPENDENCE instead of Iraq;
and put the $5Trillion He added to our National Debt….. That Stupid A$$hole would of had a REAL LEGACY and I hate to say…might of been the best President in our Nations History!!!
Take A Look At What We Could be Driving…..
Jay Leno was a total skeptic of electric cars until he got hold of a Tesla; because he only related to His 1909 Electric Car..check it out!
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video_player.shtml?vid=229378

By: Andy Andersson

Andy Andersson — Tue, 13 May 2008 23:49:22 +0000

We should not dictate technological solutions but answer the question: Why decrease carbon emissions? Quantitatively! How much damage does our emissions do? This is how much we should pay for them. To whom? To the people we hurt, and that is everybody, equally! To make it managable, stick to the US for now. People would now afford to buy their energy with this money that would come from carbon-emission permits. And they would buy the cheapest kind, and that would not be carbon based as more and more alternative energy would become available as it would now be highly competitive. Solar, nuclear, biomass, wind, wave, geothermal, you-name-it would all be developed in the economially proper proportions with the enormous incentives created by the carbon-credit purchases. What is needed is for the politicians to answer the carbon-emission damage question honestly and act accordingly.

By: MountainMike

MountainMike — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:46:11 +0000

I’ll vote for you Diggity.

Gov. Schwartenegger (pardon the spelling) and Senator Kevin Murray have a program in California to have a million solar roofs by 2018. Now if every state did that, with the help of the Fed, we can make a big dent in the problem.

Look at this:
http://gov.ca.gov/index.php?/press-release/3588/

By: Diggity

Diggity — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:35:50 +0000

I too could never vote for McCain – it’s hard to believe any Republican is genuinely concerned about the environment (or, for that matter the contents of the average middle-class American’s wallet), after such a long history of not giving a darn.

Hillary supports the gas tax holiday – C’mon Hil… I expected more from you! What a dumb idea.

Remember the old slogan “a chicken in every pot?” How about a new slogan for our next President – “A photovoltaic panel on every roof!” Think about it – every house and business in the country running solar, all grid connected, and everyone drives a plug-in. Yeah, I know… it will never happen. It’s a shame, because it’s about the only way I can think of that we can make enough of a difference to really put the skids on global warming. All I know is, the hundreds of Billions we’ve squandered in Iraq would buy an awful lot of solar panels…..