<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lincoln MKZ Hybrid&#039;s MPG Is Official: 41 in the City</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/</link>
	<description>Auto alternatives for the 21st century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in MD</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25931</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lexus CT 200h is a compact hatchback, the MKZ Hybrid is a large sedan. They may share the &quot;luxury&quot; designation, but then so do Rolls-Royces.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lexus CT 200h is a compact hatchback, the MKZ Hybrid is a large sedan. They may share the &#8220;luxury&#8221; designation, but then so do Rolls-Royces.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Man</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25930</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 25-35 years the Lincoln, (American cars in general) will be rolling across the Barrett-Jackson auction block, just like they are now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Happy Father&#039;s Day everyone!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 25-35 years the Lincoln, (American cars in general) will be rolling across the Barrett-Jackson auction block, just like they are now.</p>
<p>Happy Father&#8217;s Day everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Man</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25929</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaaaahh yes!  American automotive manufacturing is continuing to bring consumers what they want.  The same companies that rolled tanks off assembly lines during WWII are still there for us!  What can I say ... it&#039;s where my heart&#039;s at.  Keep it up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaaahh yes!  American automotive manufacturing is continuing to bring consumers what they want.  The same companies that rolled tanks off assembly lines during WWII are still there for us!  What can I say &#8230; it&#8217;s where my heart&#8217;s at.  Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25928</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[somehow these new cars makes the CAFE 2020 target of 35 mpg seem very silly. we need to push it up to 50 mpg!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>somehow these new cars makes the CAFE 2020 target of 35 mpg seem very silly. we need to push it up to 50 mpg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veek</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25927</link>
		<dc:creator>veek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, on second thought, the original figure seems fairly reasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The carbon from simply burning a gallon of fuel is only the tip of the iceberg. The Indirect Costs to bring us that fuel are surely quite high, and should at least be considered. These costs include the exploration for the oil (and the inevitable accidental spills), the roads and transportation costs, the costs of defending and securing the oil supply lines, etc., not to mention the long-term costs to our collective psyches and well-being that a &quot;cheap oil lifestyle&quot; brings.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To paraphrase an old ad:&lt;br /&gt;
The costs of a gallon of fuel burned:2.278 grams/mile.&lt;br /&gt;
The costs to bring you that gallon of fuel: 10.084 grams/mile.&lt;br /&gt;
The costs to our happiness:  priceless.&lt;br /&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles:</p>
<p>Actually, on second thought, the original figure seems fairly reasonable.</p>
<p>The carbon from simply burning a gallon of fuel is only the tip of the iceberg. The Indirect Costs to bring us that fuel are surely quite high, and should at least be considered. These costs include the exploration for the oil (and the inevitable accidental spills), the roads and transportation costs, the costs of defending and securing the oil supply lines, etc., not to mention the long-term costs to our collective psyches and well-being that a &#8220;cheap oil lifestyle&#8221; brings.  </p>
<p>To paraphrase an old ad:<br />
The costs of a gallon of fuel burned:2.278 grams/mile.<br />
The costs to bring you that gallon of fuel: 10.084 grams/mile.<br />
The costs to our happiness:  priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25926</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[veek; I was not clear.  You are correct that there are 2,278 grams of carbon per gallon of Diesel.  The 10,084 figure is grams of CO2 per gallon of Diesel.  Both numbers come from:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/420f05001.htm&lt;br /&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>veek; I was not clear.  You are correct that there are 2,278 grams of carbon per gallon of Diesel.  The 10,084 figure is grams of CO2 per gallon of Diesel.  Both numbers come from:<br />
<a href="http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/420f05001.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/420f05001.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veek</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25925</link>
		<dc:creator>veek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the figures, but something about the numbers you listed didn&#039;t quite appear right. After checking the epa.gov/otaq/climate site under calculations, it appears your figure for the grams of carbon per gallon of gasoline is right in line with the EPA&#039;s figures, but the EPA lists grams per gallon of diesel as 2,278, rather than 10,084.  Hope this helps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This gives 19.4 pounds of C02/gallon for gasoline and 22.2 for diesel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the EPA (and common sense), the actual figure depends on many other variables (such as, I assume, how the fuel is brought from the ground to the market), and the energy density of the fuels will differ, but the EPA workers start their calculators with a gallon of fuel, no matter how it arrived at the lab.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like a nice car with a power train arrangement that has worked nicely in the Fusion and Escape.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles:</p>
<p>Thanks for the figures, but something about the numbers you listed didn&#8217;t quite appear right. After checking the epa.gov/otaq/climate site under calculations, it appears your figure for the grams of carbon per gallon of gasoline is right in line with the EPA&#8217;s figures, but the EPA lists grams per gallon of diesel as 2,278, rather than 10,084.  Hope this helps.</p>
<p>This gives 19.4 pounds of C02/gallon for gasoline and 22.2 for diesel.</p>
<p>According to the EPA (and common sense), the actual figure depends on many other variables (such as, I assume, how the fuel is brought from the ground to the market), and the energy density of the fuels will differ, but the EPA workers start their calculators with a gallon of fuel, no matter how it arrived at the lab.</p>
<p>Looks like a nice car with a power train arrangement that has worked nicely in the Fusion and Escape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich S</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25924</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lincoln should have gotten an Ecoboost engine to make it distinct from the Fusion.  Not to mention better MPG and performance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lincoln should have gotten an Ecoboost engine to make it distinct from the Fusion.  Not to mention better MPG and performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25923</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ConJunTuraL:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the EPA a gallon of gasoline has 2421 grams of carbon.  So burning a gallon of gasoline produces 8788 grams (99% of carbon to CO2) of CO2.  So at 39 MPG average that works out to 225 grams/mile or 140 grams/KM.  City would be 133 grams/KM and highway would be 152.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW Diesel is 10,084 grams per gallon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ConJunTuraL:</p>
<p>According to the EPA a gallon of gasoline has 2421 grams of carbon.  So burning a gallon of gasoline produces 8788 grams (99% of carbon to CO2) of CO2.  So at 39 MPG average that works out to 225 grams/mile or 140 grams/KM.  City would be 133 grams/KM and highway would be 152.</p>
<p>BTW Diesel is 10,084 grams per gallon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConJunTuraL</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/lincoln-mkz-hybrids-mpg-official-41-city-28111/#comment-25922</link>
		<dc:creator>ConJunTuraL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7139#comment-25922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Humm... how much CO2?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humm&#8230; how much CO2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 383/388 objects using apc

 Served from: www.hybridcars.com @ 2013-06-19 00:21:30 by W3 Total Cache -->