Comments on: Hydrogen Hybrid Supercar Revealed in Las Vegas

By: Darrin

Darrin — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 01:13:19 +0000

It’s truly very complicated in this busy life to listen news on TV, therefore I just use web for that purpose, and get the most up-to-date news.

By: James123

James123 — Thu, 10 May 2012 20:38:22 +0000

I really like the look of this car. Imagine pulling up to the strip in this thing! Very nice! Thanks for sharing this info.!,
Las Vegas Garage Doors

By: Turk823

Turk823 — Fri, 14 May 2010 18:25:20 +0000

Hence the term ‘HYBRID.’ See also Websters dictionary.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:28:50 +0000

they probably killed someone to get the blue prints for this car… stanley meyers was killed by food poisoning (he had a hydrogen car in the 1990s)… denny klein and his patents had disappeared after he had sold them to GM…..

By: jdubb

jdubb — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:22:37 +0000

I have to say it has been very interesting reading everyone’s comments. The greatest thing is that the Hydrorunner G3 system does work! It won’t be long until you start hearing more about it.

By: Bob491

Bob491 — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:02:22 +0000

Tony lets not be so picky, how about avallible on demand.
Give the guy a break, I haven't seem an advertisment in ten years
that came anywhere close to the literal truth. Not just you Tony
but all of those that picked on that same point.

By: Bob491

Bob491 — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:55:23 +0000

Al is right on in his thinking of flame travel and a better burn.
The other thing that seems to have been missed is, at highway speeds and a fully charged battery, a quite a bit of electrical power is avalible at little or no cost. In a cold climete with alll accesories running or stuck in traffic, of course would be another story.

By: Tony

Tony — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:36:31 +0000

“Our system uses water from your garden hose to create hydrogen on demand,” said company COO Damon Kuhn. “The infrastructure to support this technology is here right now, not 10 years from now.”

"This quote is either deceptive or ignorant. The *water* isn't creating hydrogen."

I don't think the quote is either deceptive or ignorant, I think you may have just misread it. It doesn't say that the water creates hydrogen -- it says that the SYSTEM creates hydrogen USING water. Oversimplified? Yes, because the system obviously uses more than just water to create the hydrogen. But I think it's pretty clearly accurate.

By: Tony

Tony — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:32:12 +0000

My guess would be that the boost in efficiency does not come from the energy released by burning the H2. I've read elsewhere that you can get more energy out of gasoline by burning it in the presence of H2 than you can get by burning it alone, although I'm not sure about the details. Perhaps the burning of the H2 is able to increase the temperature in the combustion chamber allowing the primary fuel to be burned more completely.

Also, if as someone else suggested at least some of the electricity for extracting the H2 from water comes from otherwise waste sources, such as recapturing the energy lost to braking, that could also contribute to the overall efficiency gains.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:05:49 +0000

fghrthtr