Comments on: Honda Back in the Hybrid Fight

By: tapra1

tapra1 — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:31:48 +0000

“To us, the Jazz has sufficient fuel efficiency with the current gasoline engine.” Fukui told reporters today that the spike in crude oil prices convinced Honda.Tech Info

By: saç ekimi

saç ekimi — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:09:03 +0000

site was perfect ..

By: burun estetiği

burun estetiği — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:57:10 +0000

drove 60 mph which is slower than Texas’ 70 mph but I just let everyone pass me by. The result of taking it a bit easy was great gas mileage. I have over the last year managed to fill up once every three weeks.

By: xeevo

xeevo — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:34:20 +0000

If they ever want the public to purchase energy efficient automobiles, they are going to have to make them look better than this. This is got to be the stupidest car I have ever seen. I expect to see a herd of clowns pile out of it every time I see it. I want a car that looks nice, like a 69 mustang or a 93 prelude, but with great millage, like 60-80 mpg. My prelude already gets 34 mpg and it’s no hybrid. Looks a hell of a lot nicer though.

By: dangerous

dangerous — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:34:31 +0000

Oh I like this one, it really looks great and definitely a hybrid. This is one of the Car Crazed. Great body, hybrid but I hope nice interiors too. And can have it with limited budget. Great for Honda.

By: RickD

RickD — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:06:40 +0000

Anyone know if the new Honda Fit (Jazz) hybrid will be a straight hybrid or a plug-in?

By: gail Sredanovic

gail Sredanovic — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:26:50 +0000

I want a flexible vehicle for hauling stuff and running errands that has a somewhat elevated seat to accomodate creaky joints. I want something with decent visiblity. This excludes the Prius and(for me) the Toyota Matrix. I find the Matrix and even the Scion have horrible blind spots.

Give me something PRACTICAL with enough strength and power to be reasonably safe.

I don't care a fig what it looks like!

By: kazelli

kazelli — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:04:05 +0000

I think the CR-Z looks great and I'll be getting on the waiting list. I had a first gen ('87) and later a second gen ('91) CRX and loved them both. Put about 150k miles between the two of them with never an expensive or unusual repair and always averaged 45-50 mpg hwy and low 30s in town - I thought they were comfortable (but then I'm 5'0", 100 lbs) if a bit short on passenger space. I did get seven people into the first one once - we were in high school, safety wasn't on the radar.

I think the insight didn't sell well because people had different priorities then - gas was less than half the price it is now and bigger was still better in most people's minds. And it wasn't as cute or sporty as the CRX was with those funky rear wheel covers added on.

I'm considering a Fit because I have a 6'0" husband and three good sized dogs, but the CR-Z has captured my little car lovin' heart. Thank you Honda - it's been a long twenty years without the CRX in production!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:42:05 +0000

I’ll second that. The VX was my first car and I since have failed to understand why is is allegedly so hard to make an efficient car. I was getting 40mpg city without even trying. And that was in 1992.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:04:26 +0000

OMFG THATS A HOT CAR,