<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fun At The Wheel And 41 MPG Hwy For Less Than $20,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hybridcars.com/fun-wheel-and-41-mpg-less-20000-49685/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/fun-wheel-and-41-mpg-less-20000-49685/</link>
	<description>Auto alternatives for the 21st century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt. Concernicus</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/fun-wheel-and-41-mpg-less-20000-49685/#comment-39931</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Concernicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=11829#comment-39931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@John,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with you 100%.  I love automakers that go and claim high 30&#039;s or low 40&#039;s on the highway mode.  Great.  So you&#039;re 10 mpg&#039;s lower than my Prius on the highway.  That&#039;s fantastic.  You want to try and achieve numbers closer to what I get in the city or combined?  That&#039;s what I thought.  That&#039;s what I would like to say to these automakers.  lol!  A combined mileage number is a much more useful number.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John,</p>
<p>I agree with you 100%.  I love automakers that go and claim high 30&#8242;s or low 40&#8242;s on the highway mode.  Great.  So you&#8217;re 10 mpg&#8217;s lower than my Prius on the highway.  That&#8217;s fantastic.  You want to try and achieve numbers closer to what I get in the city or combined?  That&#8217;s what I thought.  That&#8217;s what I would like to say to these automakers.  lol!  A combined mileage number is a much more useful number.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/fun-wheel-and-41-mpg-less-20000-49685/#comment-39930</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=11829#comment-39930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amen, John 4.  Lots of non-hybrids approach hybrid highway mileage, i.e. 37 to 42,  but the city mileage and combined mileage comes us short.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the Dart offers is in its $19,000 version is 39 MPG highway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why not compare it to the Camry or Fusion in the $23,000 price range with 35-37 highway mileage?  Maybe it would compare favorably?  But do not compare it with a $27,000 hybrid Camry or Fusion which gets 40 MPG city (47 is being claimed for the 2013 Fusion with the HF35 tranny).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, John 4.  Lots of non-hybrids approach hybrid highway mileage, i.e. 37 to 42,  but the city mileage and combined mileage comes us short.  </p>
<p>What the Dart offers is in its $19,000 version is 39 MPG highway.</p>
<p>Why not compare it to the Camry or Fusion in the $23,000 price range with 35-37 highway mileage?  Maybe it would compare favorably?  But do not compare it with a $27,000 hybrid Camry or Fusion which gets 40 MPG city (47 is being claimed for the 2013 Fusion with the HF35 tranny).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john iv</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/fun-wheel-and-41-mpg-less-20000-49685/#comment-39929</link>
		<dc:creator>john iv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=11829#comment-39929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attn media:  Can we please stop using highway mpg numbers to advertise your fuel economy?  Let&#039;s just stick to the combined numbers.  This car&#039;s mpg numbers list it at 32.  It then compares itself to the prius; which is 50 mpg.  My 2001 toyota echo gets 35 mpg combined.  If you want to feature it&#039;s good ride, good acceleration, etc then have at it.  But I&#039;m not impressed with 32 mpg from this car.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attn media:  Can we please stop using highway mpg numbers to advertise your fuel economy?  Let&#8217;s just stick to the combined numbers.  This car&#8217;s mpg numbers list it at 32.  It then compares itself to the prius; which is 50 mpg.  My 2001 toyota echo gets 35 mpg combined.  If you want to feature it&#8217;s good ride, good acceleration, etc then have at it.  But I&#8217;m not impressed with 32 mpg from this car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 285/290 objects using apc

 Served from: www.hybridcars.com @ 2013-05-23 05:43:41 by W3 Total Cache -->