Nationalism aside, I would be more than happy to take Mr. Cavuto out for a ride when I receive mine. Yes… Americans are supporting American car companies based in California AND American Oil companies when we drive past the initial 50 miles of electric charge and the GM engine kicks in.

During our incredible ride experience, I will be pointing out that the electricity used to propel this awesome looking and mechanically inspired work of art, just happens to be made in the US. I also will share that my zero CO2 emissions, when in pure electric mode, will not be contributing to any plant photosynthesis aside the US roads we are journeying past. So sorry.

Then I’ll ask Mr. Cavuto whether he would prefer a Finish assembled Fisker because their employees probably buy US made products from time to time, or wait for a couple more years for a less costly version significantly made and assembled on US soil… because the US Government lent, not gave, this company some money to provide US jobs at that US manufacturing facility and at all the Fisker dealerships across America.

P.S. To fully disclose, which I can’t recall if I ever hear Fox News personalities or guests do, I do own shares in at least one of the companies contributing parts and expertise in the building of my soon to be made Fisker Karma. And, I believe that I placed my financially supportive deposit before former V.P. Al Gore joined one investment group initially funding Fisker Automotive. Plus most importantly, I appreciate all the hard work and dedication of everyone at hybridcars.com and offer a Karma ride to some of you as well. So there…

Telsa and Fisher is more American than any of the three big auto makers and Faux News knows that. I look forward to the day when the only cars on the road will be Telsa and Fisher.

http://www.onlineuniversalwork.com

I don’t take your point. There is a difference between accurately and inaccurately reporting the facts, and like their point of view or not, Fox is the one cable news outlet out there that does not habitually inaccurately report the facts.

“Just admit to that at least. If you disagree, then I’d guess that you think Bill Clinton didn’t “lie” when he said “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”.

I still don’t understand what you’re saying. Bill Clinton said he hadn’t had sexual relations with that woman when he had had sexual relations with that woman. Thus he lied. You could either report that he did lie, which would be accurate, or that he did not, which would be inaccurate. The only examples I can come up with of irresponsible reporting would be the accurate reporting of facts that could bring some kind of harm. For example the reporting of classified material. I don’t see any connection here at all, which I presume means I’m missing what you’re trying to convey.

Fox News reported that recovery act funds were going to EV companies that are supported by Al Gore (true); which probably received the funds as a result of their connection to Al Gore (true); and that were going to spend at least a large portion of those funds outside the US (again, true). They could have been a bit clearer about the fact that the funds in question were recovery act funds, intended expressly to create jobs in the US, which is the reason the loans were inappropriate. Keep in mind that there were also preexisting government loan guarantee programs already in place – thanks to George W. Bush – for these same kinds of investments. These loans in and of themselves aren’t controversial, at least not to Republicans — heck, they were our idea! The sole issue is the use of recovery act funds for purposes not directly resulting in the creation of US jobs. And I submit that any news organization failing to report on that is acting, in a word, irresponsibly.

Isn’t it bad enough that the foreign countries are subsidizing and dumping their foreign car product in America.We as taxpayers are also subsidizing them with the $4,000 junker deal.