skip to content

Steam-electric hybrid auto

Created February 18, 2007, at 12:23 am by Taganan

External Combustion of fuel with forced-air draft produces less pollution and what is produced is more easily controlled. EC can use any liquid or gaseous fuel so it is the ultimate in multi-fuel use. Ideally we would use biofuels so that the CO2 emissions would simply be recycled in growing crops to make biofuels. [Biofuels are another subject.] EC does not require highly refined fuels and could use ethanol, vegetable oil, propane, natural gas, methane,furnace fuel oil, kerosene, liquified coal, synthetic fuels and even hydrogen whenever it becomes practical.

The engine best suited to EC is the steam engine, but as direct power to the wheels it has drawbacks, 1. a wait of at least 30 seconds before the car can move, 2. you can't "gun it" and 3. the water can freeze. By using the steam engine to run an alternator to charge batteries which power reversible electric motors at each wheel the car could move immediately and you could "gun it". By using electric heat strips there would be no problem with freezing.

Forced air burners are efficient. Water tube boilers do not explode and make a lot of steam in a small size. There are tested and proven designs for steam engines which can be made lighter using modern alloys. Steam engines have fewer moving parts to wear out or break down, so they should last longer than IC engines. A 1930 Doble 2 cylinder compound uniflow engine has gone over 600,000 mi. with only regular maintenance.

Since the car would have an electric motor at each wheel there would be no transmission, differential or CV joints. This would compensate for any extra weight involved in the EC components. The motor/wheel unit would move to steer and a computer would replace the differential by varying the speed of each wheel. The same computer would control all engine and power functions.

The computer would automatically start the steam engine/alternator to maintain battery charge and stop it when at proper charge. When parked in a parking lot in freezing weather the heat strips would use electricity and the steam engine would be automatically started to charge the batteries. However if there were an electric outlet available, such as when in your own driveway, the car would have a cord to plug in and save fuel.

There is waste heat from the burner exhaust and from the spent steam which can be converted using thermo-electrics into extra electricity to increase the efficiency of the system. Regenerative braking is also a possible option for increasing efficiency.

I have had contacts with steam-power buffs. They refuse to consider anything but direct steam drive. Internal combustion people say steam is dangerous, boilers explode and the engines are obsolete. [All false.] They refuse to open their minds too. I hope to find some who will consider this idea, think of improvements and actually build a steam-electric car. Except for size all the designs for the burners, boilers and engines exist and need only a good machine shop. The other components are already being made and could be bought, even the controls and computer. The thermo-electrics may also be available. The high efficiency electric motors are for sale.

If I had money, a machine shop and did not have two left thumbs I would build one. I have hopes that someone out there might be inspired to do this. If so, let me know.

View user profile
Junior Member

4 years ago

I have been thinking quite a bit in the last couple of years on steam power. I have also considered in some detail the steam electric hybrid car. In fact, when I first considered the idea of a modern steam car, the most practical approach that surfaced in my mind was the steam electric parallel hybrid.

I actually have formal training in steam thermodynamics. I have a perspective on steam power that most people don't have. I recognize that all current methods used to power automobiles have inherent limitations that steam power does not have. The main problem with steam is that nobody has been willing to put in the research and the dollars toward it to fully develop its potential. However, there is one company that has developed a very promising steam engine. Even in its infancy it is demostrating efficiencies approaching the Diesel engine at greater than 30%. There is no oil lubrication of the cylinders... water condensation of the steam within the cylinders provides the lubrication. POWER TO WEIGHT is more than twice that of standard gasoline fueled automotive engines. With this technology, the hybrid approach is totally unnecessary, and would be counterproductive. However, if I were to personally attempt to construct a steam car with the performance of an average car on the road today, then I would go with the hybrid approach.

http://www.cyclonepower.com/

Nathan

3 years ago

I think it's quite foolish that steam power isn't used. But then again, it would destroy/change the way everything runs now. How much would it cost to put together a workshop for making an engine, as well as building one? (estimate)

Jay Pinckard

3 years ago

I can't imagine with the advances in technology that some one has not imagined or contrived a hybrid steam/electric vehicle. The idea of the whole thing is to eliminate dependance upon the gasoline pump at the high priced, greedy monopolistic fuel sellers.
(Arabs for one.)

Petrea Rasmussen

3 years ago

I am in complete agreement of your conclusion that external combustion steam-electric would be the wisest choice for future transportation motors. Dependence on fossil fuels is bad news on many levels - it's just this sort of new direction we must take to assure our future generations will have a life of relative comfort as we have enjoyed during this Age of Oil.

I also have a very small home machine shop and I need work. :)

I do, however, believe in lowest-cost and lowest-tech solutions. The Cyclone engine is a work of art, but we can be rougher about this. While my view doesn't comply with traditional profit-making corporate methods, I do think it could allow more folks to own, maintain and repair their engines. In particular, I've heard that IC engines have been re-purposed, as it were, to be steam-driven. Sounds feasible, low-cost and many parts become available at commodity prices ... that's the way I'm leaning in my thoughts.

A smattering of science and engineering education and experience would serve me and any possible partners well in pursuit of successful development of such a noble project. It can be done; there are no engineering or materials breakthroughs necessary. I would love to hear from anyone serious in getting started on this.

Thanks for putting this subject up!!

William Glass

3 years ago

I have been wanting to do this for a very long time ( about 2 years)

I am a computer engineer and always wanted to drive a steam car such as a stanley steamer.

I do not know where to start really, but would definitely love to build/drive one!

TeleGolum

3 years ago

If you use the same principle as the current diesel locomotives. Using a fuel fed motor (steam) to drive a dc generator then by converting the dc to independant motors on each wheel via a batter storage system. You can also use a solar skin to feed into this battery bank. Just a thought for you home designers...If the companys and government no longer work for the people it's time for the people to design and build their own and drive them wild. Imagine a vehicle that doesn't have to pay fuel tax! Wouldn't that drive the polititians mad because they can't tax it....

billybob

3 years ago

Let's get back to the Cyclone Engine. This engine does not need to idle so there is really no reason for the Hybrid way of thinking. There is no reason to carry all those heavy batteries around all the time. The pistons do not move while at a stop light the fuel is released intermitently just to keep the combustion chamber at the right temperature. Plus, with the torque being so high at low RPM you can gun the engine right from the start. External combustion engines are great off the line and the Cyclone is supposed to start up very fast, I read that it takes 15 seconds from cold start to working temp and that is not bad. All and all from what I know the Cyclone might be the answer to many of our problems.

Mr. agnostic

3 years ago

Hello, I know little to nothing about basic mechanics. However, I am compelled to learn quickly. Can anyone direct me towards an ultra-light water pipe boiler that is completly electric, or possibly give me some pointers on how to construct one. For a model (initially) aircraft I need the lightest components available. I do not wish to use any type of fuel burner, just a super light electric heating element... Can anyone make suggestions for me.
Thanks

Alex King

3 years ago

The antispam questions.. Does this mean Ive just summoned a demon or something?

DelmarvaDude

3 years ago

You'll soon figure out that I am NOT an engineer with this question, but would it be possible to carry enough batteries to power a purely electric steam engine? Thus eliminating fuel completely. The only thing you would have to add is water.

DelmarvaDude

3 years ago

P.S. The rationale would be greater range than a traditional electric motor without the mess of any combustion.

View user profile
Senior Member

3 years ago

An electric 'fired' steam engine would still have the potential to waste heat. As it is, a modern electric motor is about 90% efficient, meaning it only wastes about 10% of the battery energy as heat. This compares with an Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) wasting about 85% of the gasoline energy. I'm not sure what the overall efficiency of a cheap, lightweight, mobile steam engine would be since no one has designed one for a long time, however, it would have a tough time beating an electric motor in efficiency and simplicity.

View user profile
Member

3 years ago

High pressure superheated steam is even used by the refineries to "crack" the hydrocarbons into various gases and oils. Steam can be used efficiently if combined with other things.

Water4Gas - Save Money Using Water!

Mike Kupchik

3 years ago

NOTHING is 90% efficient. IC engines were about 15% EFF. in the 1930's today we see about 25%. Your electric motors would need SUPER conductors to even come close to maybe 70% efficience. But a steam electric YES - the chevy volt with a steam turbine gen. sounds GOOD.

View user profile
Senior Member

3 years ago

Unfortunately, you're misinformed about electric motors. Try googling electric motor efficiency and you'll find many confirmations. Here's a link to but one: http://www.ceere.org/iac/assessment%20tool/ARC2410.html. Note that this 90% efficiency number is for the motor only. The battery is about 90% efficient in charging and discharging as well so the total efficiency of a battery-electric vehicle is 90% * 90% *90% or 73% Add 90% efficiency to the power grid delivering the electricity and you get 65% efficiency.
Take your ICE which gets only about 25% efficiency (your number is 5 - 10% optimistic but I'll use it anyway) with maybe 85% transportation and delivery losses and you're at 22% efficiency.
This is why the electric drivetrain is so good.
If you don't believe me about the efficiency, lets look at an appliance that is available in electric or gasoline versions such as a weed wacker, a lawn mower, or a leaf blower. I challenge you to touch most parts of the IC motor driving any of these without burning yourself. You can easily touch nearly any part of the electric appliance.

Car-man

3 years ago

I truly believe that your train of though has become completely derailed. Why make a steam-electric hybrid? Are you so hung up on the idea of the hybrid that you can't comprehend that you are waisting a vast amount of power changing from one form of energy to another?

A steam-electric hybrid makes as much sense as a nematic-electric hybrid. No mater what you do the car can't produce any less emissions.

Just power the car with steam; simple as that!

Also, CO2 is not pollution its air, ya know, that gas plants breath and turn into O2.

Fact Checker

3 years ago

Taganan said:
External Combustion of fuel with forced-air draft produces less pollution and what is produced is more easily controlled.

Fact checker says:
The only emission from a properly built and maintained Steam Generator is CO2. CO2 is not pollution its a natural part of our atmosphere. Only those that actually believe Al Gore call it a pollution.

Taganan said:
The engine best suited to EC is the steam engine, but as direct power to the wheels it has drawbacks, 1. a wait of at least 30 seconds before the car can move, 2. you can't "gun it" and 3. the water can freeze.

Fact checker says:
I agree with you on your starting point, but after that your argument goes off into la la land.

1. So just how fast is your garage door opener? Mine takes at least 30 seconds to open.

2. What do you base that one; The Doble? A Three Ton Car, with one gear, and a 0-60 of about 8 seconds, and a top speed of 95 (120 mph on modern roads). Steam engines have about a 1 to 5 horse power to torque ratio. A 200 HP steam engine has about 1050 lb. ft of torque.
All you would need to move a modern car with a steam power cycle is about 20-40 horse power. Thats about 100-200 lb. ft. of torque, the Chevy Malibu with a 2.4 I4 only has 160 peak torque and you have to wait until 4500 rpms to get that. A steam engine will have its full torque from 0 on up.
The doble steam car made in the 1930's had well over 1000 ft-lb of torque, didn't have a transmission nor a clutch to bother with, weighed 3 tons and got 24 miles per gallon (Name any other 6000+ lbs car that gets 24 mpg?). It also had a top speed of 95 (120 on modern roads), accelerated from 0-60 in about 8 seconds (name any other 3 ton road vehicle that goes 0-60 in 8 seconds).

3. Yes water does freeze, but why is it lower than 32* in your garage? It wouldn't be that hard to have a computer controlled system that would bleed some of the 800* F steam through the pipes every now and then while the car was parked in the lot to keep the thing from freezing up. And if built right the system would be small and close together to save on heat loss.

Taganan said:
The computer would automatically start the steam engine/alternator to maintain battery charge and stop it when at proper charge. When parked in a parking lot in freezing weather the heat strips would use electricity and the steam engine would be automatically started to charge the batteries. However if there were an electric outlet available, such as when in your own driveway, the car would have a cord to plug in and save fuel.

Fact checker says:
I agree with you on the electrical outlet when at home or in a parking lot that has one, but as I said before the computer could just send a pulse of steam through the lines while sitting on the lot. Why waste the heat you have already made.

Taganan said:
There is waste heat from the burner exhaust and from the spent steam which can be converted using thermo-electrics into extra electricity to increase the efficiency of the system.

Fact checker says:
uh, you mean like a steam engine hooked up to an alternator?

Taganan said:
I have had contacts with steam-power buffs. They refuse to consider anything but direct steam drive.

Fact checker says:
They have this mentality because the idea of a steam-electric hybrid would be less fuel and energy efficient that a strait steam power cycle.

Taganan said:
Internal combustion people say steam is dangerous, boilers explode and the engines are obsolete.

Fact checker says:
Have you ever heard of the Stanly Steamer. Its the one car you can be boiled alive and burned to death in; AT THE SAME TIME! And they have blown up more than once. However, the Doble system was much more safe as it only had 2 quarts of water in the system as compared to the 25 gallon fire-tube boiler of the Stanly.

Taganan said:
I hope to find someone who will consider this idea, think of improvements and actually build a steam-electric car.

Fact checker says:
If Henry Ford had the same mind set I would be driving a car I has to body my self. Why don't you take a try at it.

Taganan said:
Except for size all the designs for the burners, boilers and engines exist and need only a good machine shop.

Fact checker says:
Speaking as someone that has already built a steam power plant for his farm here in SW Washington, the components are neither large, nor simple to make. However a proper manufacturer could make the parts in mass production that are reliable and safe.

Taganan said:
The other components are already being made and could be bought, even the controls and computer.

Fact checker says:
Only on the electrical end. Every thing for the steam system would have to be custom made.

Taganan said:
The thermo-electrics may also be available.

Fact checker says:
If their are systems that could convert heat directly into electricity you wouldn't need the steam engine. However, such does not exist. All the systems that convert waist heat into electricity are steam (water or otherwise) based.

------------------

My final words

Now that I have craped all over your idea I will say this...

It is just as viable as any other hybrid system out there. It would operate much cleaner and could possibly result in even greater fuel efficiency over ICE based systems.

If you want some one that will give an objective viewpoint, feel free to email me.

Mike Kupchik

3 years ago

No sorry my info comes from a 30year ele. engineer who DESIGNED ele motors. Being able to tuch a ele motor when running is no test of efficiency. It may seem that good but it is not. And ic ene. are about 25% efficient. You got to believe about half of what you read and haly of what you see.

Mike Kupchik

3 years ago

90% efficient! MY GOD THE HUMAN HEART IS'T that good. Electric wast more power than you think. Some are mounted in the wheel of a car and claim 50 horse power! A 5 horse ele. motor would have a armature of about 15 inchs! Electric motors are GREAT but not that great. I think a steam ele. would work very well.

View user profile
Senior Member

3 years ago

Mike,
First of all, I'm an old Navy (600 lb steamplant) man and an avid railfan so I actually do have a soft spot in my heart for steam engines. We had a 600 lb turbine system.
I also happen to be a 40+ year old electrical engineer so, as much as I love steam, I suspect that, for portable applications, its feasibility is questionable, unlike electric motors.
The reason the ability to touch an electric motor is important is that the inefficiency of a motor is generally caused by the heat that is produced. As you know a great deal of heat is generated by most IC engines and steam engines that can be challenging and expensive to recover. If you can touch a motor, there isn't much wasted energy since it is all going into the mechanical work being done.
The efficiency of the electric motor is why a modern electric car such as the EV1 and the Tesla can go 120 and 240 miles per charge (respectively) while the batteries (which hold very little energy per mass than gasoline) in them hold only about the equivalent of 1 and 2 gallons (respectively) of gas.
It really is easy with electric motors. They can easily be over 90% efficient. Look around yourself. Go ahead and google "electric motor efficiency" don't take my word for it..

Mike Kupchik

3 years ago

240 miles ! at what speed 20 mph? - If what you say is true your EV1 would be everywhere Gas cars would all be in museums; but there not because they do not work. I checked your web address and saw the web page on ele motors at 110 % effiency, It looked like cold fusion to me. My problem is the first and second laws of thermodynamics - look that up. And i looked at the ele motors on my CNC machine at work, a ele DRILL and my weed wacker - they ALL got pretty HOT. PS a soft spot for steam has nothing to do with liking steam cars i just think its a better way to go and i live in ILLINOIS and have seen 50 below 0 temp. how do you heat a all ele car?

Mike Kupchik

3 years ago

Did you all know that in 1933 there was a steam powered air plane! it did fly ( look it up on U TUBE ) built by besler systems - pretty efficient steam got off the ground!

View user profile
Senior Member

3 years ago

Mike,
You're a stubborn one, I gotta admit but I like your skepticism - that's healthy. Don't let yourself get duped by nonesense. Demand to see proof!!
That ~240 miles per charge for the Tesla is alegedly with the EPA combined cycle and their new drivetrain 1.5. I haven't measured it myself since I don't yet have a Roadster.
Did I mention that the Tesla Roadster can accelerate from 0 to 60 in less than 4 seconds as well?
Regarding the EV1, you're 100% right that were they not all taken off the road and crushed (http://ev1-club.power.net/archive/031219/jpg/after2.htm), they probably would have completely disrupted the auto industry. This is, of course only one of the possible reasons they and the entire auto industry killed the Electric cars that they built and released in California in the late '90's. Rent or buy "Who Killed the Electric Car", (http://www.sonyclassics.com/whokilledtheelectriccar/) the documentary that goes over the whole episode.
I did drive the EV1 from LA, CA to Palo Alto, CA back in 2002 with charging stops in Camarillo, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, San Luis Obispo, and Salinas. You can look on a map to see that San Luis Obispo and Salinas are about 135 miles apart. This means that I must have gotten at least that much range off of a charge.
110% efficiency, is a problem - it can't work. 90%, however can. Yep, your drill or weed wacker does get hot but compare your electric weed wacker with a gas model and tell me which gets hotter.
Heating an electric car certainly can't be done using the waste heat from the engine like an ICE car. The EV1 had a heat pump, Ford made an EV Ranger that actually had a diesel burning heater. You'll have to ask some of the folks who are getting Tesla Roadsters that live in IL about how well their heater handles the load. I don't think any of them will be delivered to IL until early 2009 though.
You're right that steam powered air planes have been tried. So have electric ones. Of course it was an electric one that set the world record for altitude at 96,000 in 2001 and is one of the hottest spyplanes in the US military today (http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS147862+07-Feb-2008+BW200...). That steam plane barely flew.
Actually, one could say that the B52 is a hybrid steam/jet plane since it can use water injection into its jets to augment the thrust on takeoff. They didn't do it too much since it shortened the engine life but steam clearly does have a place in the world.
I'm hoping to pass through Chicago next summer in my Tesla Roadster. Perhaps you'll be able to see it for yourself. In the mean time, I welcome you to surf around the web and look for credible evidence of the greatness of the electric motor.

View user profile
Member

3 years ago

Electric hybrids and all electrics are two different animals for sure. I love the Tesla roadster and the fact that it was built with off the shelf technology. I believe that as batteries continue change in breakthroughs and advances, we will eventually become an electric car society.

Are we there yet? Not by a longshot. But we are certainly heading there quickly, as we should be. But the bulk of people will not buy an electric that cannot at least duplicate or exceed the mileage in an IC driven car. Batteries will have to be charged on demand on as quickly as filling a tank of gas (perhaps a combo of the new ultracapacitors and high density batteries). It also must be comfortable with all the modern day amenities.

Until that happens, MOST people (not all) will not sign a 5 year loan on an electric.

The other end of this equation is that there are more than a half billion cars on the road around the world, it would be devastating to just suddenly dump them all (nor could that happen either). So we as a society, must seek out transitional methods to help us move from one tech to another.

Hence the beauty of a hybrid. I am personally biased towards the water hybrid (not steam) that uses simple electrolysis to increase the efficiency of gasoline or diesel. It works now, saves gas, and cleans up the exhaust. It's a simple, elegant solution that the majority of people can instigate today, as we move toward an electric society.

Alex Stadler

3 years ago

It's a very utopian idea that has been eloquently discussed here that we can move away from the ICE and transition towards the "electric" car. I've been a fan of Telsa Motors ever since I happened upon them, and I award them serious kudos for their efforts in the face of what I'm afraid I can only say are fairly nefarious political opposition, as well as, some serious hurdles, both financially and technologically.

Truth is likely as hybridman2 says, we'll have to get faster charging and also a lower entry-level cost. Tesla Motors have plans to make that happen, and, yes, there is the Volt on the way. These are great things, and I'm all for using the brown's gas in the ICE-vehicles that currently exist but I also think that we need to keep generating new ideas. It's been discussed that there are ideas for steam-powered vehicles/hybrids, but action is really what's needed.

Having said all that, what about a brown's gas steam vehicle? I'm sure at least some of you have seen the "HHO-powered" car, which I believe still utilizes some ICE technology, correct me if I am wrong. However, the same principles that allow for the HHO welding apparatus could potentially be utilized to create an extremely high temperature very rapidly. Would this create a need for a higher level of boiler reinforcement? I have just given myself a royal headache looking at the issues with specific-heat-related issues with brown's gas, but we used it for heating during the depression and if it couldn't be used for on-demand, variegated heating as in the Doble, couldn't it at the least be used as a near 0% waste source for battery charging in hybrid vehicles with extremely low operating and maintenance costs?

What's your cost for fueling? Distilled water? Maybe some electrolytic catalyst like aluminum, potassium or magnesium? Any thoughts?

View user profile
Member

3 years ago

Alex, I think if we combined the energy in Brown's gas with a modified steam boiler it could have interesting results. We actually plan on doing some research into this area, especially during the superheated steam cycle. I don't know if it would work in the initial boiler though.
HHO gas is an unusual beast. The water torches you mentioned don't weld steel with the same efficiency as a gas/acetylene, but yet they can instantly sublimate tungsten or change brick. It's a strange phenomenon that many are still experimenting with, especially when you can actually touch the tip of the torch without burning yourself.
The same torch that can cut trough tungsten, can be held on water and it won't boil, which brings me back around again to viability in steam engines.
It will take a shift from the norm to get it to work, but I believe it's possible...

Bob
Transitional Technologies, LLC

Tim Austen

3 years ago

I'm a student at the James Madison University Alternative Fuel Vehicle Lab. As a student, this concept has been brought up many times and I am in the process of researching and drawing up a plan to build this type of concept for a project next year. If you would like to bring input and help with the project just shoot me an email.

Ho Mun Wai

3 years ago

I am very impressed with Cyclone Power as described in its website. However, I am really puzzled if it is really so successful, why there has not been any automakers to invest in the technology and to bring it into practical applications?

Are there still major unresolved practical problems?

Based on the website, it seems that it is meant for direct drive rather than steam-electric hybrid.

Could someone shed some light?

Thank you.

Tom

2 years ago

I can understand a persons need to get to work on time
so how about just running a small engine to power the generator to recharge the batteries and use the heat from the burned gas to heat the water to boiling point
also water cooled engines by-product is heat ,cooled by water
so we turn the heat into hot water,close to steam then heat it the rest of the way with the hot exhaust
when the water is boiling we can shut off the gas engine and use the exhaust {with fuel and igniter } to continue boiling the water
the steam turns the turbine the turbine and the ic motor are both connected to the generator
the generator charges the batteries
we use recumbant breaking {flywheel to generator breaking}
take the steam and condense it back to water to be recycled
alcohol is our fuel and when the car is at rest the roof can provide
solar battery maintanance
a tri powerd hybred

Richard Rivera

2 years ago

Ok here is a better car to choose how about the air car it run on pressure. now if some one could build a onbord electrila system that would compress the air for its chambers and allow the car to keep runnign it run hundreds of mile before it need a air break. LOL

but seriously why buiuld steam when in france they have the air car. the usa want to incorperate a gas engine to make the car go 100 mpg. goes to show you whatthis countries directions are. We need to focus on air car. its clean air and now polution of any kind. plus the fact that there is a way to run an altenator to it.

as of steam my only factor to this would be to kame it run with eletric. given there is a way to heat elements up to allow pressure to run the engine. one might want to look into wateless heater tanks that are eleactric. you might find that this product could help as to how the car can get pressure.

too many factors to think about. but my choice would be air car. it has drw backs such ans slow take off and no gunning it. so we must take into consideration that we will have to let go of guning a car in the future if we are to make it in this world.

Real World I/O

2 years ago

We think we have the answer, at least we are trying to provide a practical power source that produces electric, steam, and convensional power for vehicles of any kind. We have patented an invention that needs more funding for development and production. But we are convinced of the importance of this improvement to efficiency and environmental concerns. It can run on any fuel and is small and solves many problems that have limited the use of steam power in recent years.

Please help generate interest and visibility of this invention, visit http://www.realworldio.com and http://www.youtube.com/user/jedareed

Thank you.

Dominic Jermano

2 years ago

The electric steam power car, Van, Truck, Bus, Train can work. It's just a matter of setting up a Company via interested Investors. What we could do is scan the world for companies who make specific parts and ask the producing company if they will donate the product they make to be used in our Electric Steam Powered Car.

This will would be a win win...because they know it is for a specific purpose, and they will be part owners to the development. No money is put at risk...except for delivery of goods to the assembly location.

I am most certain people would come forward to see its development.

The main issue is to decide on the type of design and what we need to build it.

It would be easy to get the car frame, and tires, then assemble the engine process. What? Batteries keep a thermos-tank always hot, as the steam and/or any type of nonflammable gas could circulate the electric turbine to keep the batteries charged. In fact any other inflammable gas would be more preferred than water, because the boiling point is much lower for it to turn to steam, requiring less battery energy to create the boil.

Need to decide whether the steam powers the car, or the steam is only used to power the generator which powers the electric motors, and recharges the battery.

Remember we also will have the option for wind power to power small wind generators as well located in/on various spots on the vehicle. We also can include solar panels as well, on the trunk lid, or hood, and top of the vehicle, for even more energy backup.

Wheels can have frictionless generators attached axels, that spin freely because of opposing force magnetic bearings. This is a big plus in operational reliability.

Now think of this... It will work....I have no doubts,...and then the race is on....that meaning other applications for its use....such as using in airplanes... Can you imagine the RPM's you will get from a wind power jet generator affixed to the wings.....instead of the present jet fuel powered engines they use now? I think of it as the Steam Powered Concordia....which I believe could break air speed records. If they broke the land speed records with steam on the Salt Lake Flats...think of it in the air...

How grand a technological achievement...

People interested can contact me....we can setup the objectives to move forward.

I am djermano@yahoo.com

Dom

Mr. McNett

2 years ago

I stumbled across this site in hopes of determining what was out there for a different type of hybrid... I like the ideas presented and would like to embark on a hybrid of all hybrids concept car... The idea I have would be an internal combustion engine cupeled to a steam powered engine, an internal combustion engine has a ridiculous amount of waste heat, why couldn't you pipe the IC engine exhaust through a boiler system and try to utilize the heat to create steam. I believe that the extra weight would not be an issue.

Option A- put a gear ratio with clutch between the Internal combustion engine and the steam powered engine, as the IC engine comes to proper exhaust temperature then the steam powered engine would start to roll over, clutch separating the two would release and assist the IC engine. I know that the output vs input on steam powered side could be formulated for proper gear ratio ;therefore, as the IC engine excels increased exhaust heat would be exerted and increased steam would follow. As the steam powered engine assists the IC engine the computer just like any in todays automobiles would regulate the air/fuel mixture in the combustion chambers. This design would still need a transmission and rear-end.

Option B
The internal combustion engine exhaust would be piped through the steam powered boilers. They are not attached but both run to separate generators both with means of supplying to the electric system similar to conventional hybrids of today with the addition of only the steam side. This method of course using the motors in wheels to propel automobile.

What do you think?

Flipper

2 years ago

I have read Taganan & Checker. As of mid 2009, a group has been wrapping up for the most part the exact thing you were discussing. With the design work finished, engineer with a steam background giving a thumbs up and a tenured mathmatics proffessor now signing off, this is what is waiting for prototype to be built.

250k to 400 k, mostly in materials to build prototype that is hoped to do the following.

1) Literally no waste oil or filters.
2) It is external combustion and is in fact multi-fuel capable.
3) The multi-fuel part can be developed to almost any combination of fuels but with varying degrees of mpg, power etc as related to fuel type.
4) No transmission is necessary but for the fact of a need of a reverse.
5) This design produces 2 to 3 times as much power as in IC in the same approx size range.
6) There is so much torque that it could be a problem.
7) Except for the core of the engine, the rest of parts are off the shelf parts or off the shelf materials. Custom made to varying degrees until mass produced. 8) The engine is about as silent as a burner can be therefore noise of engine is almost non-existent.
9) It can idle and be kept in a instantly "ready" status at extremely low fuel usage.
10) Harmful emissions are almost zero.
11) Up to a 50% increase in mpg.
12) Has air,land,sea capabilities. Civilian or military applications. Can be used in passenger vehicles, light trucks, short or long haul vehicles and so forth.

The only thing between the idea and a billion dollar engine or vehicle company? The funding to build the prototype and prove that it works or doesn't and if it does work, how close to design expectations does it come.

The multi-fuel, quiet running and decreased fuel consumption if design works are a one, two, three punch combination. The other benifits are obvious and the engine if works as designed, will meet or beat all current or future set standards as pertaining to IC engines. Includes idling, reduced noise pollution,increased mpg standards and non-existent waste oil problems for environment.

We are talking big rigs that could fuel up on literally anything depending on driving habits, environmental conditions, cost and comparison recommedations based on such for next fillup. American Trucking Association states that a one penny rise in fuel costs their members over 250 million so what does a 1% to 50% increase mean for that one segment. Try running numbers on that at a full 50%, run a 5 yr window, add in government vehicles and or military and you get a potential cost savings in the Trillions. What does this mean for our military to have high speed coastal/riverine craft that are quiet and can run on almost any fuel found. What would the army think of silent running vehicles in a combat arena that are only as noisy as the tracks, wheels etc and could be re-fueled with almost anything available and do so at a greatly reduced fuel consumption rate. How nice would school district busing that could save money and have our children in quiet running vehicles without them inhaling all the diesel fumes.

I am with a Federal Agency, but not an energy related position. I still cannot wrap my head around the potential if the prototype works. Just the APS (Alternate Power Source) or generator potential is staggering.

Unless you have easily available funding or are involved with one of the "Beltway Bandits", it is turning out to be extremely difficult to find funding for a project like this. Everyone wants patents, non-profit setup's, 8A contractors or other to get on board. It has been frustrating. Earlier in the year I had a major player with DOC energy tell me that all the energy fruit on the lower limbs of the tree had been picked and now everyone is looking for the next golden fruit miracle answer in the upper limbs. This project would bunny punch the industry if it works and the final mathematics shows the authenticitiy of steam use like this. I compare this to the old joke of the government paying millions to develp a pen to write in zero gravity for our astronauts and the russians pulling out a pencil.

External steam exhaust engines and such may not be the end answer to our energy and environmental problems but they show promise in creating a major buffer until the ookey-pookie futuristic ideas can be invented, developed and used.

At the end of the day, multi-fuel, decreased fuel consumption anything is good!

Want to make a boat load of $ and do something good for this country and the world? Bring someone to fund the prototype to the table. The project is literally shovel ready and the engine core could be manufactured within a few weeks. A working prototype core will then be incoporated into a working example of whatever the investor would like. If the prototype is put into the right vehicle, you could expect it to set a steam engine land speed record that a Brit team recently set. Inquires can be sent to me at executivelabor@yahoo.com

View user profile
Junior Member

2 years ago

You make a lot of sense about steam and using that with a hybrid electric system . As a mater of investigation , how would a flywheel go in maintaing engine heat .Not the initial heating but heat maintained by friction . The flywheel run by solar panels or even exersice being connected to a rod that would move in and out , within the boiler at so many intervals of the flywheel revs . Could this be integrated into what you have already demonstrated ?

Charles A. Dovey

2 years ago

what about useing rotory engines for the steam engines at each wheel? Maybe aluminium & nickle aloy to combat corrosion? email me if you like this idea!

Marty Reeves

1 year ago

I've been thinking along these same lines. It a shame that the "Steamies" won't consider anything but direct steam drive... A steam-piston engine will provide a lot of torque, but not enough "get-up-and-go" and a steam turbine is just the opposite: too much speed, not enough torque. An electric engine can deliver both.

vaibhav balaji

1 year ago

a steam turbine hybrid would at the most give you about 35% overall effeciency at the most, interesting thing would be to see if we can size down a steam tubine to fit into a car.I understand that smaller steam turbines are'nt as effecient as the one's you would find in a power plant.

View user profile
Member

1 year ago

This is a technological dead-end IMO and should not be pursued by general industry. The reason is that it doesn't address the 2 biggest problems with our current transportation infrastructure:

1.) Being highly specialized and non-extensible--it is not future compatible. Even though there have been rapid developments in alternative energy sources, our road vehicles cannot make use of them. And if a new energy source were discovered tomorrow, it too would be of no benefit to our transportation infrastructure.

Likewise, if you had a fleet of EC steam vehicles, you would still be essentially limited to the use of combustible fuels. They provide no easy way of switching to new fuel sources or even using the majority of existing clean/renewable power sources. It's also questionable whether a cheap system could be designed to effectively use all of the combustible fuels listed.

2.) Distributed power generation is enormously inefficient. Having a handful of large, centralized power plants is far more desirable than having millions of tiny power plants. Not only can you generate power more efficiently with large steam turbines, but it can also be much cleaner. Cars do have catalytic converters, but portability & cost requirements limit the amount of technology that can be used. With centralized power plants, that is not an issue. It is also cheaper to install multimillion-dollar chemical scrubbers on a couple of smoke stacks rather than millions of individual tailpipes. Furthermore, using centralized power plants also makes it easier to implement new technologies and power sources, again, by virtue of having to modify/replace only a handful of power plants rather than many millions.

Having millions of tiny steam turbines on the road is, not only very dangerous (turbines need to spin at very high speeds to be efficient; a single broken turbine blade could be disastrous), it is neither economical nor an efficient way of generating power.

Really, the only viable way have both extensibility and efficiency is to deploy plug-in electric vehicles (or gas-electric hybrids to ease the transition). An electricity-based transportation infrastructure w/ centralized power generation is essentially future-proof and will be able to immediately benefit from any technological advances or instantly adapt to new power sources.

It also creates a separation of concerns. Car designers can focus solely on building good transportation vehicles rather than a transportation vehicle + mobile power plant. And power plant designers can focus on building clean and efficient steam turbines without being limited by size, public safety, or other vehicle concerns.

Harsh Ranjangaonkar

1 year ago

Sir i am a final year student of mechanical engineering. I am interested in making a steam electric car as my final year project. I would like to get your help on this topic. Please provide me the full detailed information of this topic on my email. Also give your important suggestion related to current conditions in this field. Thank you

kip morris Jr

1 year ago

i think a hybrid steam engine is a great idea id invest 5 grand and the man hours to make it

My name is noah Rish

1 year ago

I would be very interested in starting a correspondence with you as far as design and production is concerned, I believe I have some valuable ideas to contribute, shoot me an email and maybe we can strike up a discussion

Steam electric man

1 year ago

I have read almost all responses, and my idea of designing and building a steam electric car is a smart idea. I could just build a steam car. I have several possible engines for it, however the largest of them weighs about 700lbs. You can get a four cylinder steam with adequate horse into your car and use it as a generator. An all electric is not practical at this time because there isn't enough recharging stations available. I'm in the middle of desert and I'm not willing to walk fifty miles looking for a new battery. The electric motor is a good bet except it lacks an adequate charging system to give a long enough range to make trips. I've read that when you drive an electric you don't allow the battery charge to run down that much because it ruins it's life, so charging it early is mandatory. So a steam engine will charge the batteries without many harmful hydrocarbons. It's a good debate.
For some who fear the steam engine, a double designed boiler has never exploded in history.

Steam electric man

1 year ago

Sorry I couldn't edit my post. I'm referring to Doble not double.

Steam electric man

1 year ago

I meant Doble not double.

Anonymous

1 year ago

I meant Doble not double.

Arnold Walker

41 weeks ago

What you are describing is an electric monotube boiler ...another name for a tank less water heater
thought most water heaters don't run at steam engine pressures safely. If for some reason you did build or buy one ....you would need a steamtrap .Sort of a water filter to "dry" your steam so carry of water slugs in the steam. Does not break your engine by hydra locking the engine with something that does not compress.Or erosion of blades if your are using a turbine.

Ihavea Dream

41 weeks ago

I look forward to the new steam autos from the small to the large industrial.

Jake

41 weeks ago

This is a great idea. Steam power is good for the environment too.

View user profile
Junior Member

40 weeks ago

I have been trying to talk to people about my idea for a sealed loop steam plant using electrode steam generation feeding a steam turbine that will make electricity to be used in an electric motor that inturn operates the car. I realize that Jaguar just put out a car using a small turbine powered car, but they are using 4 motors (one on each wheel) I wonder what happens if one of those motors fails while you are driving down the road. All the engineers I speak with start out by telling me "you can't build a perpetual machine." I am not proposing that. I am say that if al our submarines and aircraft carriers do it this way, why can we not adapt this technology to making electric cars and trucks (tractor trailers) that get a lot more out of a charge than 40miles. I know that Nissan says their Leaf will go 100miles, but if you look at the data on their website that is only obtainable if you drive 38mph, and the outside temp is between 62 and 72 degrees F, over relatively flat terrain. Any changes to these parameters adversely affect the range. What the car manufactureres will do is offer this and the volt for 26-30K and when they don't sell well, they will say, "Americans aren't interested in Electric Vehicles." As a person who drive 80miles a day to work each day I would love to have a vehicle that uses zero gas. But one that is so expensive and is only good to go to the store and back on a charge is useless.

Bob L.

40 weeks ago

hello all, just found this page and thought I'd chime in, I'm working on a totaly new type of turbine that will be just the thing for this setup, it looks like it will surpass anything currently available in efficiency and durability, wet steam is no problem and will use a fraction of the volume that most use today. It is the first ever bladed impulse-boundry layer hybrid turbine. It is not just another version of a tesla turbine, this is a totaly different aproach and incorporates all the best aspects of each design and does away with allmost all of there drawbacks. Patent has been filed second prototype shows promise, doing computer simulation this week to get estimate on efficiency capibilities and fine tune design perameters before next prototype is built. hope to have web page soon. If anyone is intrested I'll post test results next week. well gotta go. keep the good ideas comin'.

joez7040

34 weeks ago

Another way to solve this problem is a variation on the plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. When the vehicle is charging, an electric motor would power a 3 stage air compressor which would fill a high pressure air tank. The heat of compression would heat up a low pressure water evaporator-boiler. When the temperature of this evaporator got to 200 F. the same motor would power a 2 stage steam compressor to pump pressurized steam into a steam accumulator (this would be 2/3 filled with water to store heat). This would become a pressurized boiler-thermal battery.
When the vehicle is driven the steam compressor becomes a double expansion steam engine. The heat from condensing steam heats up the evaporator. The evaporator heats up expanding air which is flowing into the air compressor in a reverse cycle as it becomes a triple expansion air engine.
This concept is derived from 2 old types of fireless locomotives. The compressed air locomotive, especially the Mekarski system, and the fireless steam locomotive. This could work if everything were heavily insulated to retain heat. Most of the input electrical energy could be recovered as mechanical energy. A small fuel fired superheater might be necessary.

Frank Cava

29 weeks ago

If there is anyone out there with an effecient steam engine that is reliable, durable and ready for use contact me and I will put your device to use. My approach and application is not for powering cars but the torque produced from your engine will make you money. Don't hesitate, if you have something that works, the time is now...contact me

Frank
(602) 472-5925
Frankprivacy@aol.com

Frank Cava

29 weeks ago

If there is anyone out there with an effecient steam engine that is reliable, durable and ready for use contact me and I will put your device to use. My approach and application is not for powering cars but the torque produced from your engine will make you money. Don't hesitate, if you have something that works, the time is now...contact me

Frank
(602) 472-5925
Frankprivacy@aol.com

Roger A. Sheddy.

8 weeks ago

When the forced draft was mentioned, I thought right away of forced draft furnaces that were developed decades ago. A thermostat would, when the fire would run low, trigger an electric motor (or in this case, tap a little steam from the line) which would turn a worm gear, delivering pea coal (Yes! A SOLID, not a LIQUID fuel!) to the firebox. This means even cheap wood pellets could power our cars! And...in the event of a collision, the only hazard would be the pressurized steam...

Roger A. Sheddy.

8 weeks ago

When the forced draft was mentioned, I thought right away of forced draft furnaces that were developed decades ago. A thermostat would, when the fire would run low, trigger an electric motor (or in this case, tap a little steam from the line) which would turn a worm gear, delivering pea coal (Yes! A SOLID, not a LIQUID fuel!) to the firebox. This means even cheap wood pellets could power our cars! And...in the event of a collision, the only hazard would be the pressurized steam...

Post a new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.