Choosing Low Rolling Resistance Tires
Published November 3, 2009
Tire Rack put low-resistance tires to the test, using a Toyota Prius.
It’s common knowledge that keeping your tires properly inflated is a simple yet essential step toward good fuel efficiency. But figuring out what high-efficiency tire to buy in the first place is anything but straightforward. Slapping on a good pair of low rolling resistance tires can increase fuel economy by 1 to 2.5 mpg. But which ones?
Forum: Talking Tires
Discuss the ups and downs of low rolling resistance tires with other hybrid drivers.
For years, the Toyota Prius has come standard with the low resistance Goodyear Integrity. But those tires are notorious for wearing out fast, and that’s not the only compromise. "You can get a tire that will give you better mileage, but you are going to give something up," Matt Edmonds, vice president of tire discounter Tire Rack told Automotive News. "Typically that would have meant stopping distance, handling in wet conditions." (Toyota picked the Toyo Proxes A20 for 2010 Prius premium “V” trim, and the Highlander Hybrid.)
Tire Trade-Offs
In September, Tire Rack conducted a “Real World Road Ride Economy Run” to determine whether lower rolling resistance tires are effective at increasing fuel efficiency. The test used a small fleet of Toyota Prii outfitted with the Goodyear Integrity all-season radial tires as a baseline. Each tire was driven over 550 miles of a 6.6-mile loop of expressways, highways and side roads.
The Prius outfitted with the baseline tire achieved 51.4 miles per gallon, but the best performer was the new Michelin Energy Saver A/S that clocked 53.8 mpg. The Michelin HydroEdge with Green X delivered only 51.1 mpg. The other tested tires included the Bridgestone Ecopia EP100, Yokohama dB Super E-Spec, and Goodyear Assurance ComforTred.
Results from Tire Rack's "Real World Road Ride Economy Run."
The Michelin Energy Saver was also very effective in stopping the Prius when traveling at 50 mph in wet conditions—verifying Michelin claims that the Energy Saver is “up to 8 percent more fuel-efficient than standard tires” and “stops up to 8 feet shorter.” The company equates the fuel savings to reducing CO2 emission as much as planting 40 trees.
But the approximate 2-mpg advantage of the Michelin Energy Saver versus the Michelin HydroEdge Green X comes at a price. The HydroEdge, which uses a tread pattern and compound engineered for a longer life, comes with a 90,000-mile warranty. The Energy Saver A/S does not have a mileage warranty.
Low-Resistance 101
Harder tires = lower rolling resistance. And other basics.
The upcoming Chevy Volt will ride on the Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, which strikes a balance between low rolling resistance and long life. It has a tread compound designed to deliver a 27 percent reduction in rolling resistance, and comes with a 65,000-mile tread wear warranty.
Calculating the costs and the payback for a more expensive tire is also tricky. Doug Girvin, director of product marketing for Michelin, makes the argument for the more expensive and higher-mpg tire: "When you take the cost of that tire and the cost of the fuel that it took over the life of that tire vs. a slightly less expensive tire that uses a little more fuel, the average cost-per-mile driven came within one-hundredth of a penny of each other."
Most Popular Pages
Free Email Newsletter Sign-up
All the latest news in a free and engaging bundle. Totally free!









Had a bad exp on lower resistance factory tires. The traction on wet surface was just awful compared to my current tires.
Given the relatively small difference in mpg in all the tires above, I'd think traction should be a much higher priority than fuel economy. Furthermore, keeping tires properly inflated at all times probably will be the bigger efficiency factor for most people.
We bought an Escape hybrid 3 years ago, which had factory-supplied low-resistance tires. They lasted a bit more than 33,000 miles and although road noise was OK, my wife and I never felt comfortable with the wet traction, snow and ice traction, stability, wet or dry handling, and wet or dry braking. Hydroplaning was scary bad. We could not remember a worse tire (we have also driven some miles in non-hybrid Escapes, so it didn't seem the car was at fault). The major redeeming factor of the original tires was that they strongly encouraged us to drive more slowly. This was all subjective, and we had no means of providing any objectively measured data, but we were glad to see them go and should have tossed them sooner.
We now have Fortera Triple-Treads, which were rated highly by groups like Tire Rack, and they seem far superior to the low-resistance tires in every driving parameter except, perhaps, road noise (although new tires will generally perform better than a worn set). We immediately felt a remarkable difference in perceived safety from the better traction. Mileage has suffered less than 1 mpg although tires are only one factor. Not only will we never choose another low-resistance tire for our FEH, we will probably replace any that we find on any future car, until their performance improves tremendously. We don't think we should feel guilty about not squeezing every bit of mileage at a high perceived cost in vehicle safety and handling quality -- the hybrid gets decent enough mileage with the standard tires.
I'm sure this will be the first of many anecdotal observations from readers, but that's our experience.
The factory goodyears on a prius are a disaster on snow (especailly in CT with hills) For winter get snows or the over zealous traction control will kill you
For you people who have problems with wet traction, increasing your tire pressure a bit does wonders. It also will help increase mileage on top of it. The downside is snow traction goes down. So, just deflate a bit for winter for get snow tires.
The traction/turning/stopping difference between a good tire and a bad tire is way beyond inflating and deflating the tires IMHO.
Prius is also plural. It's not Prii. It's a bit confusing because what Toyota says the word means (to come before) makes Prius a verb. But the Latin word Prius is actually an adjective (this is where Toyota says the word originates). Prii would be correct if Prius was a verb in Latin. The plural of Prius as an adjective would be priora in Latin. I don't like priora either as it is a completely new word. A Toyota rep did say that there is no right and wrong way to say the plural form of Prius. So I say let's make Prius plural and singular as such great words as fish, moose and bison.
I agree with you 100%.Safety should always be #1 on our list.
The site should also compare the performance of the tires.
As you may find in specialised mags, the brands are not all the same.
if you compare michelan green with the standard michelan you will find the the performance is better on the green.
Less meters to stop, better handling and double the lifetime of the tire.
Is not a safety issue.
But if you choose other brand... You should be informed.
Post a new comment