Compare Cars
Select up to
three vehicles
to compare
side-by-side |
|
|
|
|
Free price quote!
|
Free price quote!
|
|
| $29,900 | $30,500 | |
34 / 30 MPG
7 / 8 L/100km | 34 / 31 MPG
7 / 8 L/100km | |
| $938 | $938 | |
| 375 gallons a year | 375 gallons a year | |
| 7,350 pounds a year | 7,350 pounds a year | |
| Body Type |
SUV | SUV | |
| Hybrid | Hybrid | |
| 5 | 5 | |
- More power with 2009 model
- Design is more rugged and trucklike than competition
- Reliable Ford hybrid system
| - Most fuel-efficient SUV available today
- Very smooth transitions between gas and electric
- 110-volt AC power outlet comes standard
| |
- No compelling reason to choose Mazda versus Ford version
- Rear seats are awkward to fold
- Styling not reflective of Mazda's zoom-zoom image
| - Not best SUV for towing and off-road use
- General feeling of heaviness
- Second-row seating doesn't slide or easily fold
| |
Behind The Number:
Estimated annual fuel cost
Based on $2.50 per gallon and 12,000 miles of driving per year
Behind The Number:
Estimated annual fuel use
Based on a 55% emphasis on city driving
Behind The Number:
Estimated annual greenhouse gas emissions
One gallon of gas produces approximately 19 pounds of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Other GHG pollutants are not included. Only in-use carbon emissions are included.
