<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Rejects Prop 23, Providing a Likely Boost for Green Cars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hybridcars.com/california-rejects-prop-23-providing-likely-boost-green-cars-28863/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/california-rejects-prop-23-providing-likely-boost-green-cars-28863/</link>
	<description>Auto alternatives for the 21st century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tapra1</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/california-rejects-prop-23-providing-likely-boost-green-cars-28863/#comment-27905</link>
		<dc:creator>tapra1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7669#comment-27905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[f gasoline provides additional incentive for drivers to opt for more fuel-efficient vehicles. Coupled with California&#039;s numerous other programs.&lt;a title=&quot;Calmsa&quot; href=&quot;http://calmsa.com/&quot;&gt;Calmsa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>f gasoline provides additional incentive for drivers to opt for more fuel-efficient vehicles. Coupled with California&#8217;s numerous other programs.<a title="Calmsa" href="http://calmsa.com/">Calmsa</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/california-rejects-prop-23-providing-likely-boost-green-cars-28863/#comment-27904</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7669#comment-27904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California passed the law when AB 32 passed.  Proposition 23 was a ballot measure to block AB 32 from going into effect.  So a &quot;yes&quot; vote for prop 23 would have prevented AB 32 from going into effect, a &quot;no&quot; vote would allow AB 32 to go into effect as originally planned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California passed the law when AB 32 passed.  Proposition 23 was a ballot measure to block AB 32 from going into effect.  So a &#8220;yes&#8221; vote for prop 23 would have prevented AB 32 from going into effect, a &#8220;no&#8221; vote would allow AB 32 to go into effect as originally planned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lost fan</title>
		<link>http://www.hybridcars.com/california-rejects-prop-23-providing-likely-boost-green-cars-28863/#comment-27903</link>
		<dc:creator>lost fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/wordpress12/?p=7669#comment-27903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im so confused. Did California pass a cap and trade law or not?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im so confused. Did California pass a cap and trade law or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 285/290 objects using apc

 Served from: www.hybridcars.com @ 2013-05-21 16:03:37 by W3 Total Cache -->