Comments on: Bob Lutz Continues to Stand By The Chevy Volt

By: danwat1234

danwat1234 — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:21:02 +0000

Bob Lutz is a pretty cool character.

I hope nanowire lithium ion batteries take off sooner rather than later. 60 miles or more electric range.

I would also like to see an Atkinson cycle or small diesel generator rather than the existing 1.4 liter OTTO cycle engine that is from the Cruze.
I know the engine can drive the front wheels if the battery is depleted and when the Volt is at highway speed, due to the fact that this is more efficient than having the generator charge the battery, then go to the voltage regulators and then to the electric motor, too much heat loss.
But an Atkinson, Diesel or HCCI gas engine would be a great upgrade for the Volt along with better batteries as they are developed with supreme reliability and decent cost.

By: masterofnone

masterofnone — Wed, 16 May 2012 18:50:15 +0000

” I’m averaging about 117mpg when I do use gas.” You mean you have a lifetime average of 117 mpg, right? All the Volts I have seen, including mine, get about 36 mpg after the battery runs out and running on gas only.

By: masterofnone

masterofnone — Wed, 16 May 2012 18:45:49 +0000

I took our volt on an 1100 mile trip. While the volt makes pretty good mileage (about 36) it is nothing compared to what I get when I’m commuting to work (around 300). I won’t drive the Volt on a long trip again. I hate it when my 300 mpg gets brought down to 150. I’ll rent a car. Other than the mileage drop the Volt is great for long trips. I just think its value is better used by keeping it as a commuter car.

By: Kaytlin

Kaytlin — Tue, 15 May 2012 19:23:13 +0000

I do believe in global warming because the earth has always gone through environmental changes but not at the high-speed rate we are now experiencing it. To say that humans don’t have impact on the climate is absurd.

I am also a Chevy Volt owner and I am with Bob Lutz 100% on backing extended-range electric and electric vehicles. The Volt is the greatest car I have ever owned. I used to spend about $400/month on gas and I got a $392/mos lease for a Volt so it was a wash for me to get a new car with the fuel savings. I feel good about not pumping out emissions and giving something back to the environment instead of always just consuming and taking. I’m averaging about 117mpg when I do use gas. They say gas may hit $5/gallon this summer which is not as high as our European counterparts at $9/gal. Then people will be fighting for an EREV or electric car since it only costs about $1/day to charge.

I LOVE MY CHEVY VOLT!!!!

Signed,
Happy Volt Owner

By: ken kiekens

ken kiekens — Sun, 13 May 2012 04:24:08 +0000

Congratulations to GM and FORD for bringing in the electric option. I think that is great and good planning for the future since technologies seem to be moving in that direction. Someday maybe oil would be for manufacturing plastics and advanced materials only, and then recycled. Maybe petroleum will not be burned up any more.
In China there are 20,000,000 electric motorcycles that do everything from everykind of J. I. T. deliveries, to farmers taking all thier produce to market, and mothers taking thier children to school. All this even in the rain, cold and snow. I myself am used to driving an electric bike in all kinds of weather 20km a day to teach school.
The recharge technologies for the eBikes (electric motorcycles) is 10 minutes for 20 km. It is low power DC of 10 amps on a home electric dryer circuit.
So the competition for drivers in China is with these 500 dollar (US) electric motorcycles. I myself am not tempted to buy a gasoline (ICE) car.
When I was in Canada I drove many kinds of cars, all gas guzzlers as there was no option. If I had an option I would drive an electric or plug in. I myself with a little common sense could set up an electric charging infrastructure when In North America.

By: AP

AP — Sat, 12 May 2012 23:37:56 +0000

veek, I presume that by bringing up the Vega (I'd agree it was a horrible car, and I work for GM), you are saying "once bad, always bad."

If so, know that when Toyota brought the "Toyopet" to the US, they planned on driving one across the nation to many dealers to promote it. It broke down so many times along the way that they finished their trip IN AN AMERICAN CAR (don't know which brand).

Also know that GM was thrown out of Japan after WW II so that Toyota could establish itself. They were so poor in quality then, even the Japanese wouldn't have bought them unless forced to.

So makers can change over time. You may just not have seen it.

By: veek

veek — Sat, 12 May 2012 02:44:21 +0000

Well, nice try, Mr. Lutz, and I hope you are right, but I am one of many who are skeptical about GM after having been misled time and again. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me several times, shame on me." We've paid our dues and the right to whine after many visits to the repair shops, broken parts, faded interiors after a couple of years, etc. Yes, maybe "this time it's different." Maybe. But forgive me for saying "maybe not."

Mr. Lutz's comments about right-wing propaganda machines is a distractor and a red herring. The right-wing propaganda machines didn't give us the products that make so many of us need a bit more time before buying any more from GM, including its stock or bonds, and including the Vega, uh, ah, the Volt.

By: Happy Volt Owner

Happy Volt Owner — Fri, 11 May 2012 23:12:21 +0000

Checker,
To answer your question…Limbaugh probably agreeds with Lutz on those two points. Lutz has said both many times. I agree about EV’s. That is why the Volt works so well for me. Most of the time, I hardly use any gasoline or use no gasoline. Occasionally, I need to take a really long trip, and burn gasoline at a reasonable rate.

By: Checker

Checker — Fri, 11 May 2012 17:56:42 +0000

ERROR IN THIS ARTICLE !! DO YOU MEAN LIMBAUGH ???

Lutz, an outspoken denier of the theory of global warming, said ... EVs cost too much, and offer too little distance traveled per charge to make believers out of most consumers.

By: Van

Van — Fri, 11 May 2012 01:51:52 +0000

"Lutz, an outspoken denier of the theory of global warming, said electric vehicle advocates ought to focus on the prospect of enhanced domestic energy security for maximum effect. Unfortunately, he said, EVs cost too much, and offer too little distance traveled per charge to make believers out of most consumers."

The above statement hits the truth nail on the head!!

The early market difficulties were caused in part by GM's own mistakes, i.e. "the Volt will be priced comfortably below $30,000" and will get "230 MPG"

But it is a great step forward in auto technology, and all who really care about air pollution should stand up and cheer for Mr. Lutz.